Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pyrotinib or lapatinib combined with capecitabine in HER2–positive metastatic breast cancer with prior taxanes, anthracyclines, and/ or trastuzumab: A randomized, phase II study

  • Fei Ma
  • , Quchang Ouyang
  • , Wei Li
  • , Zefei Jiang
  • , Zhongsheng Tong
  • , Yunjiang Liu
  • , Huiping Li
  • , Shiying Yu
  • , Jifeng Feng
  • , Shusen Wang
  • , Xichun Hu
  • , Jianjun Zou
  • , Xiaoyu Zhu
  • , Binghe Xu
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Central South University
  • Jilin University
  • General Hospital of People's Liberation Army
  • Tianjin Medical University
  • Hebei Medical University
  • Peking University
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Institute & Hospital
  • Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center
  • Fudan University
  • Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

291 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE Pyrotinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, showed promising antitumor activity and acceptable tolerability in a phase I trial. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of pyrotinib versus lapatinib, both in combination with capecitabine, in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer in an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Chinese patients with HER2-positive relapsed or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes, anthracyclines, and/or trastuzumab were assigned (1:1) to receive 400 mg pyrotinib or lapatinib 1,250 mg orally once per day for 21-day cycles in combination with capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 orally twice per day on days 1 to 14). The primary end point was investigator-assessed overall response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. RESULTS Between May 29, 2015, and March 15, 2016, 128 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the pyrotinib (n = 65) or lapatinib (n = 63) treatment groups. The overall response rate was 78.5% (95% CI, 68.5% to 88.5%) with pyrotinib and 57.1% (95% CI, 44.9% to 69.4%) with lapatinib (treatment difference, 21.3%; 95% CI, 4.0% to 38.7%; P = .01). The median progression-free survival was 18.1 months (95% CI, 13.9 months to not reached) with pyrotinib and 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 9.8 months) with lapatinib (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.58; P, .001). The most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse events were hand-foot syndrome in 16 of 65 patients (24.6%) in the pyrotinib group versus 13 of 63 (20.6%) in the lapatinib group; diarrhea in 10 patients (15.4%) versus three patients (4.8%), respectively; and decreased neutrophil count in six patients (9.2%) versus two patients (3.2%), respectively. CONCLUSION In women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes, anthracyclines, and/or trastuzumab, pyrotinib plus capecitabine yielded statistically significant better overall response rate and progression-free survival than lapatinib plus capecitabine in this randomized phase II trial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2610-2619
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume37
Issue number29
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 Oct 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pyrotinib or lapatinib combined with capecitabine in HER2–positive metastatic breast cancer with prior taxanes, anthracyclines, and/ or trastuzumab: A randomized, phase II study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this