Psychological effects of project-based learning in participants receiving clinical oncology teaching: A protocol of systematic review of randomized controlled trials

  • Ling Qin Song
  • , Jun Li Han
  • , Di Liu
  • , Zhi Jun Dai
  • , Shu Qun Zhang
  • , Thomas Braun

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background:This study will assess the effects of the project-based learning (PBL) for participants undergoing clinical oncology teaching (COT).Methods:A systematic and comprehensive literature records will be identified from the electronic databases of PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Springer, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. All electronic databases will be searched from their inceptions up to the present. Any relevant randomized controlled trials on the effects of PBL in participants receiving COT will be considered for inclusion. Study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. RevMan 5.3 software will be utilized for statistical analysis.Results:This study will assess the effects of PBL in participants receiving COT through assessing the primary outcomes of psychological disorders, student satisfaction, and student feedback, and secondary outcomes of examination scores, excellence rates, course examination pass rates, and clinical knowledge or skills.Conclusion:The findings of this study will summarize the latest evidence on the effects of PBL in participants receiving in COT.PROSPERO registration number:PROSPERO CRD42019150433.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere18514
JournalMedicine (United States)
Volume99
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • effects
  • oncology medicine
  • project-based learning
  • randomized controlled trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychological effects of project-based learning in participants receiving clinical oncology teaching: A protocol of systematic review of randomized controlled trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this