Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predictive machine learning model in intensive care unit patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure and two or more organ failures

  • Yee Hui Yeo
  • , Mengyi Zhang
  • , Martin S. McCoy
  • , Jian Zu
  • , Yingli He
  • , Yi Liu
  • , Juan Li
  • , Taotao Yan
  • , Yuan Wang
  • , Hirsh D. Trivedi
  • , Ju Dong Yang
  • , Vinay Sundaram
  • , Xiaodan Sun
  • , Zhujun Cao
  • , Chun Ying Wu
  • , Jonel Trebicka
  • , Fanpu Ji
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University
  • University of Münster
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
  • Veterans General Hospital-Taipei
  • China Medical University Taichung
  • European Foundation for Study of Chronic Liver Failure
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • Shaanxi Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center of Infectious Diseases

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background/Aims: Prediction of short-term mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) may enhance effective management. Methods: To develop, explain, and validate a predictive machine learning (ML) model for short-term mortality in patients with ACLF with two or more organ failures (OFs). Utilizing a large ICU cohort with detailed clinical information, we identified ACLF patients with two or more OFs according to the EASL-CLIF and NACSELD definitions. ML model was developed for each definition to predict 30-day mortality. The Shapley value was estimated to explain the models. Validation and calibration of these models were performed. Results: Of 5,994 patients with cirrhosis admitted to ICU, 1,511 met NACSELD criteria, and 1,692 met EASL-CLIF grade II or higher criteria. The CatBoost ACLF (CBA) model had the greatest accuracy in the NACSELD cohort (area under curve [AUC] of 0.87), while the Random Forest ACLF (RFA) model performed best in the EASL-CLIF cohort (AUC of 0.83). Both models showed robust calibration. The models were explained by SHAP score analysis, yielding a rank list, and the top twelve predictors were selected. Both simplified models demonstrated similar performance (CBA model: AUC 0.89, RFA model: AUC 0.81) and significantly outperformed contemporary scoring systems, including CLIF-C ACLF and MELD 3.0. The models were validated in both internal and external cohorts. A simple-touse online tool was created to predict mortality rates. Conclusions: We presented explainable, well-validated, and calibrated predictive models for ACLF patients with two or more OFs, which outperformed existing predictive scores.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1355-1371
Number of pages17
JournalClinical and Molecular Hepatology
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2025

Keywords

  • Cirrhosis
  • EASL-CLIF criteria
  • Intensive care
  • NACSELD criteria
  • Organ failure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictive machine learning model in intensive care unit patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure and two or more organ failures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this