Outcomes for Youth Receiving Intensive In-Home Therapy or Residential Care: A Comparison Using Propensity Scores

  • Richard P. Barth
  • , Johanna K.P. Greeson
  • , Shenyang Guo
  • , Rebecca L. Green
  • , Sarah Hurley
  • , Jocelyn Sisson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

89 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study compares outcomes for behaviorally troubled children receiving intensive in-home therapy (IIHT) and those receiving residential care (RC). Propensity score matching is used to identify matched pairs of youth (n = 786) with equivalent propensity for IIHT. The majority of pretreatment differences between the IIHT and RC groups are eliminated following matching. Logistic regression is then conducted on outcome differences at 1 year postdischarge. Results show that IIHT recipients had a greater tendency (.615) toward living with family, making progress in school, not experiencing trouble with the law, and placement stability compared with RC youth (.558; p < .10). This suggests that IIHT is at least as effective for achieving positive outcomes. Given IIHT's reduced restrictiveness and cost, intensive in-home services should be the preferred treatment over RC in most cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497-505
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Orthopsychiatry
Volume77
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007

Keywords

  • child welfare outcomes
  • multisystemic therapy
  • propensity score matching
  • residential care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes for Youth Receiving Intensive In-Home Therapy or Residential Care: A Comparison Using Propensity Scores'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this