TY - GEN
T1 - Optimization for energy purchase strategy at demand side through cost-probability-comparison
AU - Zhao, Na
AU - Song, Yonghua
AU - Bie, Zhaohong
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - This paper presents a demand side energy purchase strategies' selection methodology. In order to take into account the reflection of the local load forecast fluctuation which is impossible to avoid, the method of Total Time on Test Transform is applied. So the optimal solution can be obtained over a wide rang of cost probabilities' comparison. The costs based on one strategy stand for the possible costs calculated based on the possible local loads which are modified according to the experience from the local load forecast. By using this method, not only how much electricity the retailer should purchase from the long term market, but also the suitable purchase quantities from each generator can be calculated. In addition, compared with the other methods, this graphic methodology can generate a group of preferential solutions for the retailer instead of one optimal solution. Because it is not for sure that all of the generation companies that the retailer wish to sign the contract with will agree this business, the final strategy should be the first agreed solution between the retailer and all generation companies. In short, this cost probability comparison method can provide a reasonable, valid and flexible energy purchase strategy.
AB - This paper presents a demand side energy purchase strategies' selection methodology. In order to take into account the reflection of the local load forecast fluctuation which is impossible to avoid, the method of Total Time on Test Transform is applied. So the optimal solution can be obtained over a wide rang of cost probabilities' comparison. The costs based on one strategy stand for the possible costs calculated based on the possible local loads which are modified according to the experience from the local load forecast. By using this method, not only how much electricity the retailer should purchase from the long term market, but also the suitable purchase quantities from each generator can be calculated. In addition, compared with the other methods, this graphic methodology can generate a group of preferential solutions for the retailer instead of one optimal solution. Because it is not for sure that all of the generation companies that the retailer wish to sign the contract with will agree this business, the final strategy should be the first agreed solution between the retailer and all generation companies. In short, this cost probability comparison method can provide a reasonable, valid and flexible energy purchase strategy.
KW - Energy Purchase in Demand Side
KW - Forecast uncertainty
KW - Total Time on Test
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/27144545484
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:27144545484
SN - 078039156X
T3 - 2005 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting
SP - 2058
EP - 2063
BT - 2005 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting
T2 - 2005 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting
Y2 - 12 June 2005 through 16 June 2005
ER -