TY - JOUR
T1 - Numerical investigation on the difference of dispersion behavior between cryogenic liquid hydrogen and methane
AU - Pu, L.
AU - Tang, Xin
AU - Shao, Xiangyu
AU - Lei, Gang
AU - Li, Yanzhong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC
PY - 2019/8/13
Y1 - 2019/8/13
N2 - The potential hazard of cryogenic and combustible liquid propellants (hydrogen and methane) leakage caused by spontaneous damage of tanks or rupture of pipelines is still a problem for both applications and human beings. Numerical simulations have been performed to predict the fuels’ leakage and dispersion behavior differences. Based on liquid hydrogen release tests conducted by the Health & Safety Laboratory (HSL), a mixture four-phase flow model considering the liquid hydrogen and air phase transitions has been developed. The liquid phase movements in the near field, combustible clouds and cold effect clouds movement in the far field were investigated. With Froude number increases from 0.47 to 3.72, liquid hydrogen represents a downward trend while liquid methane shows a downwind trend. For combustible clouds, the movements of hydrogen are larger than that of methane in both downwind and vertical direction on a quasi-stable state. For cold effect clouds, the dispersion of methane is greater than that of hydrogen in Froude number of 0.47, 0.93, 1.86, but then smaller in larger Froude number of 3.72.
AB - The potential hazard of cryogenic and combustible liquid propellants (hydrogen and methane) leakage caused by spontaneous damage of tanks or rupture of pipelines is still a problem for both applications and human beings. Numerical simulations have been performed to predict the fuels’ leakage and dispersion behavior differences. Based on liquid hydrogen release tests conducted by the Health & Safety Laboratory (HSL), a mixture four-phase flow model considering the liquid hydrogen and air phase transitions has been developed. The liquid phase movements in the near field, combustible clouds and cold effect clouds movement in the far field were investigated. With Froude number increases from 0.47 to 3.72, liquid hydrogen represents a downward trend while liquid methane shows a downwind trend. For combustible clouds, the movements of hydrogen are larger than that of methane in both downwind and vertical direction on a quasi-stable state. For cold effect clouds, the dispersion of methane is greater than that of hydrogen in Froude number of 0.47, 0.93, 1.86, but then smaller in larger Froude number of 3.72.
KW - Concentration and temperature field comparison
KW - Dispersion of dangerous propellants
KW - Liquid hydrogen and methane leakage
KW - Mixture four-phase model
KW - Safety
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85067997853
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.219
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.219
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85067997853
SN - 0360-3199
VL - 44
SP - 22368
EP - 22379
JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
IS - 39
ER -