Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Numerical analysis of vane endwall film cooling and heat transfer with different mainstream turbulence intensities and blowing ratios

  • Xi Yang
  • , Ke Zhang
  • , Junmei Wu
  • , Jiang Lei
  • , Pengfei Su
  • , Yu Fang
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University
  • Dongfang Turbine Co. Ltd.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

In present study, effects of mainstream turbulence intensity and blowing ratio on the endwall film cooling and heat transfer are numerically investigated. Upstream double-row streamwise cylindrical holes with inclination angel (θ) of 30 deg is applied. Four blowing ratios (M = 0.5, 1.0 1.5, 2.0) and three turbulence intensities (Tu = 5%, 15%, 25%) are studied. Distributions of film cooling effectiveness and heat transfer coefficient are presented together with vortex structure. Results show that with the increasing of blowing ratio, the strength of horseshoe vortex is significantly weakened and the level of film cooling effectiveness is obviously improved. In addition, the low heat transfer zone downstream the holes and upstream the leading edge is enlarged because of the increased momentum, while the high heat transfer zone at the exit of passage gradually shrinks. With the increasing of turbulence intensity, the variation of film cooling effectiveness is very limited, but the level of heat transfer near the pressure side in the second half of the vane passage obviously decreases. Moreover, a more uniform film coverage and heat transfer distribution is obtained at high turbulence intensities.

Original languageEnglish
Article number107482
JournalInternational Journal of Thermal Sciences
Volume175
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2022

Keywords

  • Blowing ratio
  • Film cooling effectiveness
  • Heat transfer coefficient
  • Mainstream turbulence intensity
  • Vane endwall

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Numerical analysis of vane endwall film cooling and heat transfer with different mainstream turbulence intensities and blowing ratios'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this