TY - JOUR
T1 - Multivariate quantitative analysis of metal elements in steel using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
AU - Wang, Zhi
AU - Chu, Yanwu
AU - Chen, Feng
AU - Sheng, Ziqian
AU - Guo, Lianbo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Optical Society of America.
PY - 2019/9/20
Y1 - 2019/9/20
N2 - Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), an element-detection technology with the advantages of no sample preparation and in situ detection of metal samples, is suitable for the quantitative analysis of metal samples. However, severe spectral interference in the detection of metal samples makes the quantitative analysis difficult. Three quantitative analysis methods, including single-variable calibration, partial least squares regression (PLSR), and support vector regression (SVR), are used to conduct the quantitative analysis of four common metal elements (Manganese (Mn), Chromium (Cr), Vanadium (V), and Titanium (Ti)). The PLSR model adds interference spectrum lines to the model for linear modeling, while the SVR model adds interference spectrum lines to the model for nonlinear modeling. The quantitative analysis results of the nonlinear SVR model are the best. The R square (R2) values of Mn, Cr, V, and Ti are 0.993, 0.995, 0.990, and 0.992, respectively. The root-mean-squared errors of the prediction set of Mn, Cr, V, and Ti are 0.044, 0.045, 0.011, and 0.014, respectively. Therefore, the results of PLSR and SVR are better than the calibration curves of the spectral intensity and concentration due to the influence of multivariate factors. SVR has almost no element bias, while PLSR and the single-variable calibration model have different quantitative results due to the different degrees of influence on spectral lines. These results demonstrate that the combined influence of the spectral interference, background noise, and self-absorption can be suppressed by the nonlinear quantitative analysis model in the steel field using LIBS.
AB - Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), an element-detection technology with the advantages of no sample preparation and in situ detection of metal samples, is suitable for the quantitative analysis of metal samples. However, severe spectral interference in the detection of metal samples makes the quantitative analysis difficult. Three quantitative analysis methods, including single-variable calibration, partial least squares regression (PLSR), and support vector regression (SVR), are used to conduct the quantitative analysis of four common metal elements (Manganese (Mn), Chromium (Cr), Vanadium (V), and Titanium (Ti)). The PLSR model adds interference spectrum lines to the model for linear modeling, while the SVR model adds interference spectrum lines to the model for nonlinear modeling. The quantitative analysis results of the nonlinear SVR model are the best. The R square (R2) values of Mn, Cr, V, and Ti are 0.993, 0.995, 0.990, and 0.992, respectively. The root-mean-squared errors of the prediction set of Mn, Cr, V, and Ti are 0.044, 0.045, 0.011, and 0.014, respectively. Therefore, the results of PLSR and SVR are better than the calibration curves of the spectral intensity and concentration due to the influence of multivariate factors. SVR has almost no element bias, while PLSR and the single-variable calibration model have different quantitative results due to the different degrees of influence on spectral lines. These results demonstrate that the combined influence of the spectral interference, background noise, and self-absorption can be suppressed by the nonlinear quantitative analysis model in the steel field using LIBS.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85072539039
U2 - 10.1364/AO.58.007615
DO - 10.1364/AO.58.007615
M3 - 文章
C2 - 31674417
AN - SCOPUS:85072539039
SN - 1559-128X
VL - 58
SP - 7615
EP - 7620
JO - Applied Optics
JF - Applied Optics
IS - 27
ER -