TY - JOUR
T1 - Multi-objective optimization research of open and closed air brayton cycle
AU - Song, Meihui
AU - Qian, Yiran
AU - Leng, Yuyang
AU - Liu, Tao
AU - Yu, Lianyun
AU - Chen, Weixiong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Xi'an Jiaotong University
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Air Brayton cycle obtains the significant advantages of high efficiency, compact structure, easy medium requirement and so on, which is one of the most suitable choices for the mobile nuclear power conversion system. In this paper, system-component combined design method is used to establish the open and closed air Brayton cycle of diverse configurations. Based on performance and compactness targets, the multi-objective optimization is carried out to find the optimal design by nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II and entropy weight method. According to the analysis, the closed intercooling reheating recuperating cycle is the configuration with the best comprehensive performance, with cycle efficiency of 33.58 %, power density of 175.39 kW m−3 and power mass ratio of 68.60 kW t−1. The open simple recuperating cycle is the configuration with the smallest volume and mass, with cycle efficiency of 20.01 %, system volume of 6.56 m3 and system mass of 19.98 t. The closed intercooling recuperating cycle is the most balanced configuration, with cycle efficiency of 31.33 %, volume of 9.06 m3 and system mass of 24.97 t. Based on the optimal results, off-design performance analysis of different environmental conditions is also carried out for the configurations above.
AB - Air Brayton cycle obtains the significant advantages of high efficiency, compact structure, easy medium requirement and so on, which is one of the most suitable choices for the mobile nuclear power conversion system. In this paper, system-component combined design method is used to establish the open and closed air Brayton cycle of diverse configurations. Based on performance and compactness targets, the multi-objective optimization is carried out to find the optimal design by nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II and entropy weight method. According to the analysis, the closed intercooling reheating recuperating cycle is the configuration with the best comprehensive performance, with cycle efficiency of 33.58 %, power density of 175.39 kW m−3 and power mass ratio of 68.60 kW t−1. The open simple recuperating cycle is the configuration with the smallest volume and mass, with cycle efficiency of 20.01 %, system volume of 6.56 m3 and system mass of 19.98 t. The closed intercooling recuperating cycle is the most balanced configuration, with cycle efficiency of 31.33 %, volume of 9.06 m3 and system mass of 24.97 t. Based on the optimal results, off-design performance analysis of different environmental conditions is also carried out for the configurations above.
KW - Air brayton cycle
KW - Multi-objective optimization
KW - Off-design analysis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85198727060
U2 - 10.1016/j.jandt.2024.07.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jandt.2024.07.001
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85198727060
SN - 2468-6050
VL - 6
SP - 21
EP - 31
JO - International Journal of Advanced Nuclear Reactor Design and Technology
JF - International Journal of Advanced Nuclear Reactor Design and Technology
IS - 1
ER -