TY - JOUR
T1 - Machine learning and population pharmacokinetics
T2 - a hybrid approach for optimizing vancomycin therapy in sepsis patients
AU - Chen, Keyu
AU - Wang, Chuhui
AU - Wei, Yu
AU - Ma, Sinan
AU - Huang, Weijia
AU - Dong, Yalin
AU - Wang, Yan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Chen et al.
PY - 2025/5
Y1 - 2025/5
N2 - Predicting vancomycin exposure is essential for optimizing dosing regimens in sepsis patients. While population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models are commonly used, their performance is limited. Machine learning (ML) models offer advantages over PPK models, but it remains unclear which model—PPK, Bayesian, ML, or hybrid PPK-ML—is best for predicting vancomycin exposure across different clinical scenarios in sepsis patients. This study compares the performance of these models in predicting the 24 hour area under the blood concentration curve (AUC24) to support precision dosing in sepsis care. Data from sepsis patients treated with intravenous vancomycin were sourced from the MIMIC-IV database. The data set was split into training and testing sets, and four models—PPK, Bayesian, ML, and hybrid—were developed. In the testing set, AUC24 was predicted using all models, and performance was evaluated using mean absolute error, mean squared error, root mean squared error, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and R2. A total of 4,059 patients were included. In the absence of vancomycin concentration data, the hybrid model outperformed both PPK and Bayesian models, with MAPE improvements of 58% and 17%, respectively. When vancomycin concentration data were available, the Bayesian model demonstrated the best performance (MAPE: 13.37% vs 68.17%, 34.17%, and 28.52% for PPK, Random Forest, and hybrid models). The hybrid model is recommended to predict AUC24 when concentration data were unavailable, while the Bayesian model should be used when concentrations were available, offering robust strategies for precise vancomycin dosing in sepsis patients.
AB - Predicting vancomycin exposure is essential for optimizing dosing regimens in sepsis patients. While population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models are commonly used, their performance is limited. Machine learning (ML) models offer advantages over PPK models, but it remains unclear which model—PPK, Bayesian, ML, or hybrid PPK-ML—is best for predicting vancomycin exposure across different clinical scenarios in sepsis patients. This study compares the performance of these models in predicting the 24 hour area under the blood concentration curve (AUC24) to support precision dosing in sepsis care. Data from sepsis patients treated with intravenous vancomycin were sourced from the MIMIC-IV database. The data set was split into training and testing sets, and four models—PPK, Bayesian, ML, and hybrid—were developed. In the testing set, AUC24 was predicted using all models, and performance was evaluated using mean absolute error, mean squared error, root mean squared error, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and R2. A total of 4,059 patients were included. In the absence of vancomycin concentration data, the hybrid model outperformed both PPK and Bayesian models, with MAPE improvements of 58% and 17%, respectively. When vancomycin concentration data were available, the Bayesian model demonstrated the best performance (MAPE: 13.37% vs 68.17%, 34.17%, and 28.52% for PPK, Random Forest, and hybrid models). The hybrid model is recommended to predict AUC24 when concentration data were unavailable, while the Bayesian model should be used when concentrations were available, offering robust strategies for precise vancomycin dosing in sepsis patients.
KW - drug exposure
KW - machine learning
KW - population pharmacokinetics
KW - sepsis
KW - vancomycin
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105004749617
U2 - 10.1128/spectrum.00499-25
DO - 10.1128/spectrum.00499-25
M3 - 文章
C2 - 40162774
AN - SCOPUS:105004749617
SN - 2165-0497
VL - 13
JO - Microbiology Spectrum
JF - Microbiology Spectrum
IS - 5
ER -