Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of adjuvant therapy on outcomes after curative-intent resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma

  • Jing Jing Hou
  • , Shishir K. Maithel
  • , Sharon M. Weber
  • , George Poultsides
  • , Christopher L. Wolfgang
  • , Ryan C. Fields
  • , Jin He
  • , Charles Scoggins
  • , Kamron Idrees
  • , Perry Shen
  • , Xu Feng Zhang
  • , Timothy M. Pawlik
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University
  • Emory University
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Stanford University
  • New York University
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Louisville
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Wake Forest University
  • Ohio State University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The benefit of adjuvant therapy (AT) after curative resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) remains unclear. The objective of the current study was to investigate the impact of AT on long-term survival of patients who underwent curative-intent resection for DCC. Methods: Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for DCC between 2000 and 2020 were identified from a multi-institutional database. The primary outcomes included overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: Among 245 patients, 150 (61.2%) patients received AT (chemotherapy alone: n = 43; chemo- and radiotherapy: n = 107) after surgical resection, whereas 95 (38.8%) patients underwent surgery only. Patients who received AT were younger, and more likely to have an advanced tumor with the presence of perineural invasion (PNI), lymph node metastasis (LNM), lymph-vascular invasion, and higher T categories (all p < 0.05). Overall, there was no difference in OS (median, surgery + AT 25.5 vs. surgery alone 24.5 months, p = 0.27) or RFS (median, surgery + AT 15.8 vs. surgery alone 18.9 months, p = 0.24) among patients who did versus did not receive AT. In contrast, AT was associated with improved long-term survival among patients with PNI (median OS, surgery + AT 25.9 vs. surgery alone 17.8 months, p = 0.03; median RFS, surgery + AT 15.9 vs. surgery alone 11.9 months, p = 0.04) and LNM (median, surgery + AT 20.0 vs. surgery alone 17.8 months, p = 0.03), but not among patients with no PNI or LNM (all p > 0.1). Conclusions: AT was commonly utilized among patients with DCC. Patients with more advanced disease, including the presence of PNI or LNM, benefited the most from AT with improved long-term outcomes among this subset of patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)607-615
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Surgical Oncology
Volume127
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Mar 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • adjuvant therapy
  • distal cholangiocarcinoma
  • lymph node metastasis
  • perineural invasion
  • recurrence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of adjuvant therapy on outcomes after curative-intent resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this