Impact factors and novel strategies for improving biohydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells

  • Dongle Cheng
  • , Huu Hao Ngo
  • , Wenshan Guo
  • , Soon Woong Chang
  • , Dinh Duc Nguyen
  • , Shicheng Zhang
  • , Shihai Deng
  • , Ding An
  • , Ngoc Bich Hoang

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

71 Scopus citations

Abstract

Microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) system is an environmentally friendly method for clean biohydrogen production from a wide range of biowastes owing to low greenhouse gas emissions. This approach has relatively higher yields and lower energy costs for biohydrogen production compared to conventional biological technologies and direct water electrolysis, respectively. However, biohydrogen production efficiency and operating costs of MEC still need further optimization to realize its large-scale application. This paper provides a unique review of impact factors influencing biohydrogen production in MECs, such as microorganisms and electrodes. Novel strategies, including inhibition of methanogens, development of novel cathode catalyst, advanced reactor design and integrated systems, to enhance low-cost biohydrogen production, are discussed based on recent publications in terms of their opportunities, bottlenecks and future directions. In addition, the current challenges, and effective future perspectives towards the practical application of MECs are described in this review.

Original languageEnglish
Article number126588
JournalBioresource Technology
Volume346
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

Keywords

  • Biohydrogen
  • Biowastes
  • Influencing factors
  • Microbial electrolysis cells
  • Novel strategy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact factors and novel strategies for improving biohydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this