Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Global citrus root microbiota unravels assembly cues and core members

  • Monia F. Lombardo
  • , Yunzeng Zhang
  • , Jin Xu
  • , Pankaj Trivedi
  • , Pengfan Zhang
  • , Nadia Riera
  • , Lei Li
  • , Yayu Wang
  • , Xin Liu
  • , Guangyi Fan
  • , Jiliang Tang
  • , Helvécio D. Coletta-Filho
  • , Jaime Cubero
  • , Xiaoling Deng
  • , Veronica Ancona
  • , Zhanjun Lu
  • , Balian Zhong
  • , M. Caroline Roper
  • , Nieves Capote
  • , Vittoria Catara
  • Gerhard Pietersen, Abdullah M. Al-Sadi, Xun Xu, Jian Wang, Huanming Yang, Tao Jin, Gabriella Cirvilleri, Nian Wang
  • University of Florida
  • University of Catania
  • Yangzhou University
  • Colorado State University
  • BGI-Shenzhen
  • Guangxi University
  • Instituto Agronômico de Campinas
  • National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA-CSIC)
  • South China Agricultural University
  • Texas A&M University-Kingsville
  • Gannan Normal University
  • University of California at Riverside
  • Instituto de Investigacion y Formacion Agraria y Pesquera
  • Stellenbosch University
  • Sultan Qaboos University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Citrus is one of the most important fruit crops worldwide, and the root-associated microbiota can have a profound impact on tree health and growth. Methods: In a collaborative effort, the International Citrus Microbiome Consortium investigated the global citrus root microbiota with samples collected from nine citrus-producing countries across six continents. We analyzed 16S rDNA and ITS2 amplicon sequencing data to identify predominant prokaryotic and fungal taxa in citrus root samples. Comparative analyses were conducted between root-associated microbial communities and those from the corresponding rhizosphere and bulk soil samples. Additionally, genotype-based group-wise comparisons were performed to assess the impact of citrus genotype on root microbiota composition. Results: Ten predominant prokaryotic phyla, containing nine bacterial phyla including Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Bacteroidetes and one archaeal phylum (Thaumarchaeota), and multiple fungal phyla including Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were identified in the citrus root samples. Compared with the microbial communities from the corresponding rhizosphere and bulk soil samples from the same trees, the prokaryotic and fungal communities in the roots exhibited lower diversity and complexity but greater modularity compared to those in the rhizosphere. In total, 30 root-enriched and 150 root-depleted genera in bacterial community were identified, whereas 21 fungal genera were enriched, and 147 fungal genera were depleted in the root niche compared with the rhizosphere. The citrus genotype significantly affected the root prokaryotic and fungal communities. In addition, we have identified the core root prokaryotic genera comprising Acidibacter, Allorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Chitinophaga, Cupriavidus, Devosia, Dongia, Niastella, Pseudomonas, Sphingobium, Steroidobacter and Streptomyces, and the core fungal genera including Acrocalymma, Cladosporium, Fusarium, Gibberella, Mortierella, Neocosmospora and Volutella. The potential functions of these core genera of root microbiota were predicted. Conclusion: Overall, this study provides new insights into the assembly of microbial communities and identifies core members of citrus root microbiota across a wide geographic range. The findings offer valuable information for manipulating root microbiota to enhance plant growth and health.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1405751
JournalFrontiers in Microbiology
Volume15
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • beneficial microorganisms
  • biological control agents
  • core microbiome
  • endophytes
  • rootstock selection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global citrus root microbiota unravels assembly cues and core members'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this