Fuzuloparib Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma (FZOCUS-2): A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial

  • Ning Li
  • , Youzhong Zhang
  • , Jing Wang
  • , Jianqing Zhu
  • , Li Wang
  • , Xiaohua Wu
  • , Desheng Yao
  • , Qiang Wu
  • , Jihong Liu
  • , Junying Tang
  • , Rutie Yin
  • , Ge Lou
  • , Ruifang An
  • , Guonan Zhang
  • , Xiaoping Xia
  • , Qingshui Li
  • , Yaping Zhu
  • , Hong Zheng
  • , Xinfeng Yang
  • , Yuanjing Hu
  • Xin Zhang, Min Hao, Yi Huang, Zhongqiu Lin, Dong Wang, Xiaoqing Guo, Shuzhong Yao, Xiaoyun Wan, Huaijun Zhou, Liangqing Yao, Xielan Yang, Heng Cui, Yuanguang Meng, Songling Zhang, Jing Qu, Ben Zhang, Jianjun Zou, Lingying Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSEThis phase III trial aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of fuzuloparib (formerly fluzoparib) versus placebo as a maintenance treatment after response to second-or later-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with high-grade, platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer.PATIENTS AND METHODSPatients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer previously treated with at least two platinum-based regimens were assigned (2:1) to receive fuzuloparib (150 mg, twice daily) or matching placebo for 28-day cycles. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) in the overall population and PFS by BIRC in the subpopulation with germline BRCA 1/2 mutation.RESULTSBetween April 30, 2019, and January 10, 2020, 252 patients were randomly assigned to the fuzuloparib (n = 167) or placebo (n = 85). As of July 1, 2020, the median PFS per BIRC assessment in the overall population was significantly improved with fuzuloparib treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.25; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.36; one-sided P <.0001) compared with that with placebo. The HR derived from a prespecified subgroup analysis showed a consistent trend of benefit in patients with germline BRCA 1/2 mutations (HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.28) or in those without mutations (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.74). The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events reported in the fuzuloparib group were anemia (25.1%), decreased platelet count (16.8%), and decreased neutrophil count (12.6%). Only one patient (0.6%) discontinued fuzuloparib because of treatment-related toxicity (concurrent decreased white blood cell count and neutrophil count).CONCLUSIONFuzuloparib as maintenance therapy achieved a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer versus placebo, regardless of germline BRCA 1/2 mutation, and showed a manageable safety profile.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2436-2446
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume40
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2022
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fuzuloparib Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma (FZOCUS-2): A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this