TY - JOUR
T1 - First-principles calculation on the adhesion strength, fracture mechanism, interfacial bonding of the NiTi (111)//α-Al2O3 (0001) interfaces
AU - Chen, Lu
AU - Li, Y.
AU - Xiao, Bing
AU - Zheng, Qiaoling
AU - Gao, Y.
AU - Zhao, Siyong
AU - Wang, Zhicheng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors
PY - 2019/12/5
Y1 - 2019/12/5
N2 - NiTi//Al2O3 composites have many advantages such as large elasticity, superior hardness and wear resistance. But there is little information available about the novel adhesion strength, fracture mechanism and interfacial bonding of NiTi//Al2O3 composites at the atomic scale. Therefore, the work of adhesion (Wad), interfacial energy (γ) and electronic structure of NiTi(111)//α-Al2O3(0001) interfaces have been calculated using first-principles calculations. For the models with the same stacking site, O-terminated interfaces have larger Wad and smaller γ than Al-terminated interfaces. For the models with same termination, the stability of Ni(Ti)-Al interfaces decreases with the order of HCP > MT > OT, while the stability of Ni(Ti)-O interfaces decreases as MT > HCP > OT. The Ti-O-MT interface belongs to the most stable interfacial configuration with the smallest interface energy among all studied interfaces. Using Griffith's theory, it is predicted that the mechanical failure of NiTi//α-Al2O3 interfaces are inclined to initiate in the interior of NiTi bulk or at the interface rather than Al2O3 side in most cases. Furthermore, density of states and electron density difference analysis indicate that the dominant interfacial adhesion mechanism for the Ni–Al interfaces is the formation of mainly metallic Ti–Al and Ni–Al bonds, while the Ti–O interface exhibits mixed covalent/ionic character with higher interfacial binding strength.
AB - NiTi//Al2O3 composites have many advantages such as large elasticity, superior hardness and wear resistance. But there is little information available about the novel adhesion strength, fracture mechanism and interfacial bonding of NiTi//Al2O3 composites at the atomic scale. Therefore, the work of adhesion (Wad), interfacial energy (γ) and electronic structure of NiTi(111)//α-Al2O3(0001) interfaces have been calculated using first-principles calculations. For the models with the same stacking site, O-terminated interfaces have larger Wad and smaller γ than Al-terminated interfaces. For the models with same termination, the stability of Ni(Ti)-Al interfaces decreases with the order of HCP > MT > OT, while the stability of Ni(Ti)-O interfaces decreases as MT > HCP > OT. The Ti-O-MT interface belongs to the most stable interfacial configuration with the smallest interface energy among all studied interfaces. Using Griffith's theory, it is predicted that the mechanical failure of NiTi//α-Al2O3 interfaces are inclined to initiate in the interior of NiTi bulk or at the interface rather than Al2O3 side in most cases. Furthermore, density of states and electron density difference analysis indicate that the dominant interfacial adhesion mechanism for the Ni–Al interfaces is the formation of mainly metallic Ti–Al and Ni–Al bonds, while the Ti–O interface exhibits mixed covalent/ionic character with higher interfacial binding strength.
KW - Electronic structure
KW - Fracture mechanism
KW - Interfacial energy
KW - Work of adhesion
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85070648588
U2 - 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108119
DO - 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108119
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85070648588
SN - 0264-1275
VL - 183
JO - Materials and Design
JF - Materials and Design
M1 - 108119
ER -