TY - JOUR
T1 - Fine structures of acoustic emission spectra
T2 - How to separate dislocation movements and entanglements in 316L stainless steel
AU - Chen, Yan
AU - Gou, Boyuan
AU - Fu, Wei
AU - Chen, Can
AU - Ding, Xiangdong
AU - Sun, Jun
AU - Salje, Ekhard K.H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Author(s).
PY - 2020/12/28
Y1 - 2020/12/28
N2 - Intermittent avalanches in a multitude of materials are characterized by acoustic emission, AE, where local events lead to strain relaxations and generate shock waves (so-called "jerks"), which are measured at the sample surface. The bane of this approach is that several avalanche mechanisms may contribute to the same AE spectrum so that a detailed analysis of each individual contribution becomes virtually impossible. It is, hence, essential to develop tools to separate signals from different dynamical processes, such as ferroic domain switching, collapse of porous inclusions, dislocation movements, entanglements, and so on. Particularly, difficult cases are dynamical microstructures in fcc alloys where the AE signal strength is weak. Nevertheless, using profile analysis of AE signals, we can distinguish between two mechanisms, namely, dislocation movements and dynamic entanglements in fcc 316L stainless steel. In this approach, we are able to measure the statistical AE durations of both subsets separately. The fingerprint for superposed avalanches with different durations is seen by the scaling between the energy E and the maximum amplitude A of each avalanche E ∼Ax with x = 2. While the same exponent x applies for both mechanisms, the scaling relation shows two branches with different absolute energy values. The two mechanisms are then confirmed by separating the energy distributions P(E) ∼E-ϵ for the two mechanisms with ϵ = 1.55 for dislocation movements and ϵ = 1.36 for entanglements.
AB - Intermittent avalanches in a multitude of materials are characterized by acoustic emission, AE, where local events lead to strain relaxations and generate shock waves (so-called "jerks"), which are measured at the sample surface. The bane of this approach is that several avalanche mechanisms may contribute to the same AE spectrum so that a detailed analysis of each individual contribution becomes virtually impossible. It is, hence, essential to develop tools to separate signals from different dynamical processes, such as ferroic domain switching, collapse of porous inclusions, dislocation movements, entanglements, and so on. Particularly, difficult cases are dynamical microstructures in fcc alloys where the AE signal strength is weak. Nevertheless, using profile analysis of AE signals, we can distinguish between two mechanisms, namely, dislocation movements and dynamic entanglements in fcc 316L stainless steel. In this approach, we are able to measure the statistical AE durations of both subsets separately. The fingerprint for superposed avalanches with different durations is seen by the scaling between the energy E and the maximum amplitude A of each avalanche E ∼Ax with x = 2. While the same exponent x applies for both mechanisms, the scaling relation shows two branches with different absolute energy values. The two mechanisms are then confirmed by separating the energy distributions P(E) ∼E-ϵ for the two mechanisms with ϵ = 1.55 for dislocation movements and ϵ = 1.36 for entanglements.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85099245849
U2 - 10.1063/5.0030508
DO - 10.1063/5.0030508
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85099245849
SN - 0003-6951
VL - 117
JO - Applied Physics Letters
JF - Applied Physics Letters
IS - 26
M1 - 262901
ER -