Exploring Intrinsic Alignments within Text Corpus

Recent years have witnessed rapid advancements in the safety alignments of large language models (LLMs). Methods such as supervised instruction fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) have thus emerged as vital components in constructing LLMs. While these methods achieve robust and fine-grained alignment to human values, their practical application is still hindered by high annotation costs and incomplete human alignments. Besides, the intrinsic human values within training corpora have not been fully exploited. To address these issues, we propose ISAAC (Intrinsically Supervised Alignments by Assessing Corpus), a primary and coarse-grained safety alignment strategy for LLMs. ISAAC only relies on a prior assumption about the text corpus, and does not require preferences in RLHF or human responses selection in SFT. Specifically, it assumes a long-tail distribution of text corpus and employs a specialized sampling strategy to automatically sample high-quality responses. Theoretically, we prove that this strategy can improve the safety of LLMs under our assumptions. Empirically, our evaluations on mainstream LLMs show that ISAAC achieves a safety score comparable to current SFT solutions. Moreover, we conduct experiments on ISAAC for some RLHF-based LLMs, where we find that ISAAC can even improve the safety of these models under specific safety domains. These findings demonstrate that ISAAC can provide preliminary alignment to LLMs, thereby reducing the construction costs of existing human-feedback-based methods.