Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Exploring Chinese EFL learners’ beliefs about AI-mediated informal digital learning of English: Insights from Q Methodology

  • Xiaochen Wang
  • , Yang Gao
  • , Barry Lee Reynolds
  • , Qikai Wang
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University
  • University of Macau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) plays an important role in language learning; how-ever, research on its role in informal contexts remains limited. To address this gap, this study used Q methodology with a sample of 20 Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners to explore their beliefs about AI-mediated informal digital learning of English. Results reported three primary types of beliefs: optimistic AI beliefs, critical AI beliefs, and hesitant AI beliefs. Optimistic AI beliefs reflect learners who view AI as a revolutionary tool that boosts learning efficiency and engagement, showing enthusiasm for new AI applications in language learning. Critical AI beliefs characterize learners who recognize AI’s benefits but remain cautious, critically assessing its limitations and potential drawbacks. Hesitant AI beliefs describe learners who, while acknowledging AI’s potential, harbor doubts about its overall effectiveness in informal English learning. These findings have some implications for the design and development of more effective and personalized AI-based educational tools that cater to diverse learner needs and preferences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-146
Number of pages16
JournalPorta Linguarum
Volume2025-September
Issue numberSpecial Issue 13
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2025

Keywords

  • AI
  • Chinese EFL learners
  • Informal digital learning of English
  • Learner belief
  • Q-Methodology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring Chinese EFL learners’ beliefs about AI-mediated informal digital learning of English: Insights from Q Methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this