Erratum: Intermediate Phase Enhances Inorganic Perovskite and Metal Oxide Interface for Efficient Photovoltaics (Joule (2020) 4(1) (222–234), (S2542435119305379), (10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.007))

Jiahuan Zhang; Zaiwei Wang; Aditya Mishra; Maolin Yu; Mona Shasti; Wolfgang Tress; Dominik Józef Kubicki; Claudia Esther Avalos; Haizhou Lu; Yuhang Liu; Brian Irving Carlsen; Anand Agarwalla; Zishuai Wang; Wanchun Xiang; Lyndon Emsley; Zhuhua Zhang; Michael Grätzel; Wanlin Guo; Anders Hagfeldt

doi:10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.011

Erratum: Intermediate Phase Enhances Inorganic Perovskite and Metal Oxide Interface for Efficient Photovoltaics (Joule (2020) 4(1) (222–234), (S2542435119305379), (10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.007))

Jiahuan Zhang
, Zaiwei Wang
, Aditya Mishra
, Maolin Yu
, Mona Shasti
, Wolfgang Tress
, Dominik Józef Kubicki
, Claudia Esther Avalos
, Haizhou Lu
, Yuhang Liu
, Brian Irving Carlsen
, Anand Agarwalla
, Zishuai Wang
, Wanchun Xiang
, Lyndon Emsley
, Zhuhua Zhang
, Michael Grätzel
, Wanlin Guo
, Anders Hagfeldt

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Abstract

Main Text (Joule 4, 222–234; January 15, 2020) We have identified three minor errors in the original published version of this article. 1 The legends of control device and IPE device in Figure 4D are reversed.2 The chemical formula “CsPb(I_0.75Br_0.25)₃-0.5FAI_0.24Br_0.76” should be “CsPb(I_0.75Br_0.25)₃-0.5FAI_0.26Br_0.74” in Figure 3E and the corresponding legend.3 In the Supplemental Information, the fitted equation E_g = 1.88 − 0.0727 x in Figure S13 is oversimplified, which led to the non-correspondence with x = 0.26 and E_g = 1.86 eV. We have replaced it with a more precise fitted equation E_g = 1.879 − 0.0727 x. The fitted equation and value x = 0.26 in Figure S13 were revised. A revised Supplemental Information file has been provided.These errors have now been fixed online, and the authors apologize for any confusion they may have caused.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	507-508
Number of pages	2
Journal	Joule
Volume	4
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.011
State	Published - 19 Feb 2020

Access to Document

10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.011

Cite this

Zhang, J., Wang, Z., Mishra, A., Yu, M., Shasti, M., Tress, W., Kubicki, D. J., Avalos, C. E., Lu, H., Liu, Y., Carlsen, B. I., Agarwalla, A., Wang, Z., Xiang, W., Emsley, L., Zhang, Z., Grätzel, M., Guo, W., & Hagfeldt, A. (2020). Erratum: Intermediate Phase Enhances Inorganic Perovskite and Metal Oxide Interface for Efficient Photovoltaics (Joule (2020) 4(1) (222–234), (S2542435119305379), (10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.007)). Joule, 4(2), 507-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.011

@article{6449df1fa7d94d21b9006415c3e50343,

title = "Erratum: Intermediate Phase Enhances Inorganic Perovskite and Metal Oxide Interface for Efficient Photovoltaics (Joule (2020) 4(1) (222–234), (S2542435119305379), (10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.007))",

abstract = "Main Text (Joule 4, 222–234; January 15, 2020) We have identified three minor errors in the original published version of this article. 1 The legends of control device and IPE device in Figure 4D are reversed.2 The chemical formula “CsPb(I0.75Br0.25)3-0.5FAI0.24Br0.76” should be “CsPb(I0.75Br0.25)3-0.5FAI0.26Br0.74” in Figure 3E and the corresponding legend.3 In the Supplemental Information, the fitted equation Eg = 1.88 − 0.0727 x in Figure S13 is oversimplified, which led to the non-correspondence with x = 0.26 and Eg = 1.86 eV. We have replaced it with a more precise fitted equation Eg = 1.879 − 0.0727 x. The fitted equation and value x = 0.26 in Figure S13 were revised. A revised Supplemental Information file has been provided.These errors have now been fixed online, and the authors apologize for any confusion they may have caused.",

author = "Jiahuan Zhang and Zaiwei Wang and Aditya Mishra and Maolin Yu and Mona Shasti and Wolfgang Tress and Kubicki, \{Dominik J{\'o}zef\} and Avalos, \{Claudia Esther\} and Haizhou Lu and Yuhang Liu and Carlsen, \{Brian Irving\} and Anand Agarwalla and Zishuai Wang and Wanchun Xiang and Lyndon Emsley and Zhuhua Zhang and Michael Gr{\"a}tzel and Wanlin Guo and Anders Hagfeldt",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Elsevier Inc.",

year = "2020",

month = feb,

day = "19",

doi = "10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.011",

language = "英语",

volume = "4",

pages = "507--508",

journal = "Joule",

issn = "2542-4351",

publisher = "Cell Press",

number = "2",

}

Zhang, J, Wang, Z, Mishra, A, Yu, M, Shasti, M, Tress, W, Kubicki, DJ, Avalos, CE, Lu, H, Liu, Y, Carlsen, BI, Agarwalla, A, Wang, Z, Xiang, W, Emsley, L, Zhang, Z, Grätzel, M, Guo, W & Hagfeldt, A 2020, 'Erratum: Intermediate Phase Enhances Inorganic Perovskite and Metal Oxide Interface for Efficient Photovoltaics (Joule (2020) 4(1) (222–234), (S2542435119305379), (10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.007))', Joule, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 507-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.011

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Intermediate Phase Enhances Inorganic Perovskite and Metal Oxide Interface for Efficient Photovoltaics (Joule (2020) 4(1) (222–234), (S2542435119305379), (10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.007))

AU - Zhang, Jiahuan

AU - Wang, Zaiwei

AU - Mishra, Aditya

AU - Yu, Maolin

AU - Shasti, Mona

AU - Tress, Wolfgang

AU - Kubicki, Dominik Józef

AU - Avalos, Claudia Esther

AU - Lu, Haizhou

AU - Liu, Yuhang

AU - Carlsen, Brian Irving

AU - Agarwalla, Anand

AU - Wang, Zishuai

AU - Xiang, Wanchun

AU - Emsley, Lyndon

AU - Zhang, Zhuhua

AU - Grätzel, Michael

AU - Guo, Wanlin

AU - Hagfeldt, Anders

PY - 2020/2/19

Y1 - 2020/2/19

N2 - Main Text (Joule 4, 222–234; January 15, 2020) We have identified three minor errors in the original published version of this article. 1 The legends of control device and IPE device in Figure 4D are reversed.2 The chemical formula “CsPb(I0.75Br0.25)3-0.5FAI0.24Br0.76” should be “CsPb(I0.75Br0.25)3-0.5FAI0.26Br0.74” in Figure 3E and the corresponding legend.3 In the Supplemental Information, the fitted equation Eg = 1.88 − 0.0727 x in Figure S13 is oversimplified, which led to the non-correspondence with x = 0.26 and Eg = 1.86 eV. We have replaced it with a more precise fitted equation Eg = 1.879 − 0.0727 x. The fitted equation and value x = 0.26 in Figure S13 were revised. A revised Supplemental Information file has been provided.These errors have now been fixed online, and the authors apologize for any confusion they may have caused.

AB - Main Text (Joule 4, 222–234; January 15, 2020) We have identified three minor errors in the original published version of this article. 1 The legends of control device and IPE device in Figure 4D are reversed.2 The chemical formula “CsPb(I0.75Br0.25)3-0.5FAI0.24Br0.76” should be “CsPb(I0.75Br0.25)3-0.5FAI0.26Br0.74” in Figure 3E and the corresponding legend.3 In the Supplemental Information, the fitted equation Eg = 1.88 − 0.0727 x in Figure S13 is oversimplified, which led to the non-correspondence with x = 0.26 and Eg = 1.86 eV. We have replaced it with a more precise fitted equation Eg = 1.879 − 0.0727 x. The fitted equation and value x = 0.26 in Figure S13 were revised. A revised Supplemental Information file has been provided.These errors have now been fixed online, and the authors apologize for any confusion they may have caused.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85079374908

U2 - 10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.011

DO - 10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.011

M3 - 评论/辩论

AN - SCOPUS:85079374908

SN - 2542-4351

VL - 4

SP - 507

EP - 508

JO - Joule

JF - Joule

IS - 2

ER -

Erratum: Intermediate Phase Enhances Inorganic Perovskite and Metal Oxide Interface for Efficient Photovoltaics (Joule (2020) 4(1) (222–234), (S2542435119305379), (10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.007))

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this