TY - JOUR
T1 - Eribulin mesilate versus vinorelbine in women with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer
T2 - A randomised clinical trial
AU - Yuan, Peng
AU - Hu, Xichun
AU - Sun, Tao
AU - Li, Wei
AU - Zhang, Qingyuan
AU - Cui, Shude
AU - Cheng, Ying
AU - Ouyang, Quchang
AU - Wang, Xiaojia
AU - Chen, Zhendong
AU - Hiraiwa, Masahide
AU - Saito, Kenichi
AU - Funasaka, Setsuo
AU - Xu, Binghe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s)
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin monotherapy, relative to vinorelbine, in Chinese women with locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: This phase III open-label, randomised, parallel-group, multicentre clinical trial enrolled patients with locally recurrent or MBC who had had 2–5 prior chemotherapy regimens, including an anthracycline and taxane) from September 26, 2013, to May 19, 2015. Women were randomised 1:1 to receive eribulin (1.4 mg/m 2 , intravenously, on day 1 and day 8) or vinorelbine (25 mg/m 2 , intravenously, on day 1, day 8 and day 15) every 21 days. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response and overall survival (OS). Results: Five hundred thirty women were randomised to receive eribulin (n = 264) or vinorelbine (n = 266). Improvement in PFS was observed with eribulin compared with vinorelbine (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65–0.98, P = 0.036); median PFS was 2.8 months in both treatment arms. The median OS was 13.4 months with eribulin and 12.5 months with vinorelbine (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.80–1.31, P = 0.838). The ORR was 30.7% (95% CI: 25.2%–36.6%) with eribulin and 16.9% (95% CI: 12.6%–22.0%) with vinorelbine (P < 0.001). Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were less frequent with eribulin (7.2%) than with vinorelbine (14.0%). Conclusions: Eribulin achieved statistically significantly superior PFS (and response rate) compared with vinorelbine in previously treated women with locally recurrent or MBC. Eribulin appeared to be better tolerated than vinorelbine, with no new safety signals observed. Trial registration: National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov registry, NCT02225470. Registered 05 August 2014- Retrospectively registered. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02225470?term=NCT02225470&rank=1.
AB - Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin monotherapy, relative to vinorelbine, in Chinese women with locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: This phase III open-label, randomised, parallel-group, multicentre clinical trial enrolled patients with locally recurrent or MBC who had had 2–5 prior chemotherapy regimens, including an anthracycline and taxane) from September 26, 2013, to May 19, 2015. Women were randomised 1:1 to receive eribulin (1.4 mg/m 2 , intravenously, on day 1 and day 8) or vinorelbine (25 mg/m 2 , intravenously, on day 1, day 8 and day 15) every 21 days. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response and overall survival (OS). Results: Five hundred thirty women were randomised to receive eribulin (n = 264) or vinorelbine (n = 266). Improvement in PFS was observed with eribulin compared with vinorelbine (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65–0.98, P = 0.036); median PFS was 2.8 months in both treatment arms. The median OS was 13.4 months with eribulin and 12.5 months with vinorelbine (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.80–1.31, P = 0.838). The ORR was 30.7% (95% CI: 25.2%–36.6%) with eribulin and 16.9% (95% CI: 12.6%–22.0%) with vinorelbine (P < 0.001). Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were less frequent with eribulin (7.2%) than with vinorelbine (14.0%). Conclusions: Eribulin achieved statistically significantly superior PFS (and response rate) compared with vinorelbine in previously treated women with locally recurrent or MBC. Eribulin appeared to be better tolerated than vinorelbine, with no new safety signals observed. Trial registration: National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov registry, NCT02225470. Registered 05 August 2014- Retrospectively registered. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02225470?term=NCT02225470&rank=1.
KW - Eribulin
KW - Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer
KW - Progression-free survival
KW - Tolerability
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85063529887
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.02.002
M3 - 文章
C2 - 30928806
AN - SCOPUS:85063529887
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 112
SP - 57
EP - 65
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -