TY - JOUR
T1 - Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Combined with Automated Quantitative DNA Cytometry Can Improve the Value in the Detection of Pancreatic Malignancy
AU - Zhao, Min
AU - Yang, Li
AU - Fu, Xin
AU - Yang, Qiao
AU - Liu, Na
AU - Guo, Changcun
AU - Ke, Xiaoru
AU - Wang, Xin
AU - Guo, Xuegang
AU - Wu, Kaichun
AU - Fan, Daiming
AU - Zhang, Hongbo
AU - Zhang, Xiaoyin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Objectives Quantitative DNA-image cytometry (ICM) is used to diagnose malignancy via detecting changes in DNA content. We aimed to estimate the value of cytology, DNA-ICM, and their combination in diagnosing pancreatic malignancy. Methods One hundred twenty-one endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration samples from 116 patients suspected for pancreatic malignancy were examined by cytology and DNA-ICM. Their results and the final diagnoses (malignancy or not) were collected. Diagnostic values were compared among cytology, DNA-ICM, and their combination. Results The DNA-ICM had a lower sensitivity and accuracy than cytology (64.2% vs 81.1%; 71.9% vs 85.1%). The combination of the techniques significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy compared with that of cytology or DNA-ICM alone (0.932 vs 0.905, P = 0.02; 0.932 vs 0.821, P < 0.0001). Using the Youden index, we determined that one cell with DI (DNA index) ≥2.5 is the optimal cutoff value for DNA-ICM to diagnose pancreatic malignancy. After adoption of this criterion, the sensitivity and accuracy were improved to 74.7% and 80.2% with DNA-ICM and 90.5% and 92.6% with the combined method. Conclusions The DNA-ICM is an effective complementary method to cytology in diagnosing pancreatic malignancy. Although the diagnostic value for DNA-ICM is lower than that of cytology, an improved value was obtained after their combination.
AB - Objectives Quantitative DNA-image cytometry (ICM) is used to diagnose malignancy via detecting changes in DNA content. We aimed to estimate the value of cytology, DNA-ICM, and their combination in diagnosing pancreatic malignancy. Methods One hundred twenty-one endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration samples from 116 patients suspected for pancreatic malignancy were examined by cytology and DNA-ICM. Their results and the final diagnoses (malignancy or not) were collected. Diagnostic values were compared among cytology, DNA-ICM, and their combination. Results The DNA-ICM had a lower sensitivity and accuracy than cytology (64.2% vs 81.1%; 71.9% vs 85.1%). The combination of the techniques significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy compared with that of cytology or DNA-ICM alone (0.932 vs 0.905, P = 0.02; 0.932 vs 0.821, P < 0.0001). Using the Youden index, we determined that one cell with DI (DNA index) ≥2.5 is the optimal cutoff value for DNA-ICM to diagnose pancreatic malignancy. After adoption of this criterion, the sensitivity and accuracy were improved to 74.7% and 80.2% with DNA-ICM and 90.5% and 92.6% with the combined method. Conclusions The DNA-ICM is an effective complementary method to cytology in diagnosing pancreatic malignancy. Although the diagnostic value for DNA-ICM is lower than that of cytology, an improved value was obtained after their combination.
KW - DNA cytometry
KW - cytology
KW - endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration
KW - pancreatic malignancy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85039034755
U2 - 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000964
DO - 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000964
M3 - 文章
C2 - 29215542
AN - SCOPUS:85039034755
SN - 0885-3177
VL - 47
SP - 40
EP - 45
JO - Pancreas
JF - Pancreas
IS - 1
ER -