Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy of utidelone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine for heavily pretreated, anthracycline- and taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer: final analysis of overall survival in a phase III randomised controlled trial

  • study group of BG01-1323L
  • China Medical University
  • Harbin Medical University
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center
  • General Hospital of People's Liberation Army
  • Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
  • Henan Cancer Hospital
  • Fudan University
  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
  • Tianjin Medical University
  • Peking University
  • Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute
  • Nankai University
  • Shandong Cancer Hospital
  • The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
  • Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital
  • Sichuan University
  • Wuhan Union Hospital
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Nantong Tumor Hospital
  • Hebei Medical University
  • Fujian Medical University
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Beijing Biostar Technologies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Primary analysis of the phase III trial BG01-1323L demonstrated that utidelone plus capecitabine significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) versus capecitabine alone in heavily-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Here, we report the final overall survival (OS) analysis and updates of other endpoints. Patients and methods: In total, 405 patients were randomised 2:1 to receive utidelone (30 mg/m2 IV daily, days 1-5, over 90 min) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d., days 1-14) or capecitabine alone (1250 mg/m2 orally b.i.d., days 1-14) every 21 days. The secondary endpoint, OS, was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier product-limit approach at a two-sided alpha level of 0.05 after the prespecified 310 death events had been reached. Exploratory analyses of the primary endpoint, PFS, and the secondary endpoint, ORR, were also done. Safety was analysed in patients who had at least one dose of study drug. Results: At the final OS analysis, the median duration of follow-up was 19.6 months in the utidelone plus capecitabine group and 15.4 months in the capecitabine alone group. In the intention-to-treat population, 313 deaths had occurred at data cut-off, 203 of 270 patients in the combination group and 110 of 135 in the monotherapy group. Median OS in the combination group was 19.8 months compared with 16.0 months in the monotherapy group [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.75, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.59-0.94, P = 0.0142]. The updated analysis of PFS and ORR showed that the combination therapy remained superior to monotherapy. Safety results were similar to those previously reported with respect to incidence, severity and specificity. No late-emerging toxicities or new safety concerns occurred. Conclusions: For heavily-pretreated, anthracycline- and taxane-resistant MBC patients, utidelone plus capecitabine significantly improved OS versus capecitabine alone. These results support the use of utidelone plus capecitabine as a novel therapeutic regimen for patients with MBC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)218-228
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Oncology
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • anthracycline- and taxane-refractory
  • capecitabine
  • metastatic breast cancer
  • overall survival
  • utidelone

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of utidelone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine for heavily pretreated, anthracycline- and taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer: final analysis of overall survival in a phase III randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this