Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Does the change of official promotion assessment standards contribute to the improvement of urban environmental quality?

  • Nan Li
  • , Chen Feng
  • , Beibei Shi
  • , Rong Kang
  • , Wendong Wei
  • Northwest University China
  • Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
  • Shaanxi Key Laboratory for Carbon Neutral Technology
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Official promotion assessment standards are an important factor affecting the environmental governance of local governments. The study of the Chinese government adding the evaluation of ecological civilization to the official promotion assessment standards is of great significance to promote China's environmental pollution control and eco-environmental protection. Therefore, it is necessary to explore diversified ways of environmental governance from the perspective of improving the assessment standards for official promotion. Based on this background, this paper uses a variety of econometric models to compare the impact of traditional assessment standards and new assessment standards, including environmental factors on environmental quality. The results show that: (1) Different from the negative environmental impact brought by traditional assessment, when the official promotion assessment standards change, that is, when it is included in the environmental assessment, the official promotion incentive can actively promote the improvement of regional environmental quality, and this result has a more significant effect on the improvement of environmental quality in economically underdeveloped areas and vulnerable areas. (2) The mechanism test shows that the change of assessment standards will force officials to improve environmental quality by improving regional productivity. (3) the promotion of environmental supervision, represented by the development of information technology, helps strengthen the positive effect of the transformation of official assessment standards on the environment. However, it is unstable. This paper provides a useful reference for improving official promotion assessment standards, exploring diversified ways of environmental governance, and clarifying the effectiveness of the Chinese government's ecological environment reform.

Original languageEnglish
Article number131254
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume348
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 May 2022
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  3. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • DID method
  • Environmental constraints
  • Environmental quality
  • Official promotion
  • Transformation of political assessment mechanism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does the change of official promotion assessment standards contribute to the improvement of urban environmental quality?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this