TY - JOUR
T1 - Design and optimal thermal efficiency contrastive analysis on closed Brayton cycle systems with different fluids of fluoride-salt-cooled high-temperature advanced reactor
AU - Li, Xinyu
AU - Zhang, Dalin
AU - Yun, Shichang
AU - Zhou, Xingguang
AU - Jiang, Dianqiang
AU - Lv, Xindi
AU - Feng, Zhenyu
AU - Wu, Wenqiang
AU - Tian, Wenxi
AU - Qiu, Suizheng
AU - Su, G. H.
AU - Zhao, Quanbin
AU - Liu, Xiuting
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/5/25
Y1 - 2023/5/25
N2 - To match the advantages of Fluoride-Salt-cooled high-Temperature Advanced Reactor, the closed Brayton cycle system was considered as the energy conversion system, and the thermodynamic analysis, conjugate gradient optimization, and exergy analysis were performed. The pinch point constraint method based on simultaneous equations was proposed to improve the calculation efficiency and ensure the unity of comparison standards, and the exergy analysis was used to quantify and optimize the exergy losses for the equipment. The thermodynamic characteristics of the power cycle systems with various fluids were analyzed, including far-critical fluids: air, nitrogen, helium, and argon, and near-critical fluids: carbon dioxide, sulfur hexafluoride, propane, and xenon. The results of the thermodynamic analysis show that for near-critical fluids, the efficiency of the SF6 cycle is the highest reaching 46.6% without considering the chemical reactions, while for far-critical fluids: air and N2, the thermal efficiencies are 45.6% and 45.5% respectively. The thermal efficiency of the far-critical fluid cycle is more sensitive to turbine efficiency, meaning enough thermal efficiency can be achieved without too high adiabatic efficiency of the compressor and isentropic efficiency of the turbine. However, far-critical fluid cycles do not have this characteristic. The results of the exergy analysis show the CO2 cycle has the highest potential to improve thermal efficiency, which has the highest improvement from 43.48% to 49.31% with the recompression process. The method and conclusion of this paper can provide references for the design and optimization of the Brayton power cycle system.
AB - To match the advantages of Fluoride-Salt-cooled high-Temperature Advanced Reactor, the closed Brayton cycle system was considered as the energy conversion system, and the thermodynamic analysis, conjugate gradient optimization, and exergy analysis were performed. The pinch point constraint method based on simultaneous equations was proposed to improve the calculation efficiency and ensure the unity of comparison standards, and the exergy analysis was used to quantify and optimize the exergy losses for the equipment. The thermodynamic characteristics of the power cycle systems with various fluids were analyzed, including far-critical fluids: air, nitrogen, helium, and argon, and near-critical fluids: carbon dioxide, sulfur hexafluoride, propane, and xenon. The results of the thermodynamic analysis show that for near-critical fluids, the efficiency of the SF6 cycle is the highest reaching 46.6% without considering the chemical reactions, while for far-critical fluids: air and N2, the thermal efficiencies are 45.6% and 45.5% respectively. The thermal efficiency of the far-critical fluid cycle is more sensitive to turbine efficiency, meaning enough thermal efficiency can be achieved without too high adiabatic efficiency of the compressor and isentropic efficiency of the turbine. However, far-critical fluid cycles do not have this characteristic. The results of the exergy analysis show the CO2 cycle has the highest potential to improve thermal efficiency, which has the highest improvement from 43.48% to 49.31% with the recompression process. The method and conclusion of this paper can provide references for the design and optimization of the Brayton power cycle system.
KW - Closed Brayton Cycle
KW - FuSTAR
KW - Pinch Point
KW - Thermal Efficiency
KW - Thermodynamic Analysis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85150457200
U2 - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120291
DO - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120291
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85150457200
SN - 1359-4311
VL - 226
JO - Applied Thermal Engineering
JF - Applied Thermal Engineering
M1 - 120291
ER -