Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Density of deep trap states in oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays

  • Qian Zhang
  • , Verónica Celorrio
  • , Kieren Bradley
  • , Flurin Eisner
  • , David Cherns
  • , Wei Yan
  • , David J. Fermín
  • University of Bristol
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

75 Scopus citations

Abstract

Correlations between the population of deep trap states in an array of TiO2 nanotubes (NT) and the dynamic photocurrent responses under supra-band-gap illumination are investigated. Ordered arrays of TiO2 NT of 10 μm length, 125 nm inner diameter, and 12 nm wall thickness featuring strong anatase character were obtained by anodization of Ti in ethylene glycol solution containing NH4F. Cyclic voltammograms at pH 10 show the characteristic responses for nanostructured TiO2 electrodes, in particular a sharp cathodic peak as the electron density in the film increases. These responses are associated with the population of deep trap states with an average value of 5 × 104 electrons per NT. Dynamic photocurrent measurements clearly show that the characteristic rise time of the photocurrent increases as the potential is increased above the onset region for charging deep trap states. At potentials in which deep trap states are fully depopulated in the dark, photocurrent rise time approaches values just below 1 s, which is more than 3 orders of magnitude slower than the estimated RC time constant. The occupancy of the deep trap states under photostationary conditions is a fraction of the density of states estimated from voltammetric responses. These findings are discussed in the context of current views about trap states in high surface area TiO2 electrodes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18207-18213
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry C
Volume118
Issue number31
DOIs
StatePublished - 7 Aug 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Density of deep trap states in oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this