TY - JOUR
T1 - Decomposition Methods for Tourism Demand Forecasting
T2 - A Comparative Study
AU - Zhang, Chengyuan
AU - Li, Mingchen
AU - Sun, Shaolong
AU - Tang, Ling
AU - Wang, Shouyang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Decomposition methods are extensively used for processing the complex patterns of tourism demand data. Given tourism demand data’s intrinsic complexity, it is critical to theoretically understand how different decomposition methods provide solutions. However, a comprehensive comparison of decomposition methods in tourism demand forecasting is still lacking. Hence, this study systematically investigates the forecasting performance of decomposition methods in tourism demand. Nine popular decomposition methods and six forecasting methods are employed, and their forecasting performance is compared. With Hong Kong visitor arrivals from eight major sources as a sample, three main conclusions are obtained from empirical results. First, all the decomposition methods generally outperform benchmark at all horizons, in both the level and directional forecasting. Second, decomposition methods can be divided into four categories based on forecasting accuracy. Finally, variational mode decomposition method is consistently superior to other eight decomposition methods and can provide the best forecasts in all cases.
AB - Decomposition methods are extensively used for processing the complex patterns of tourism demand data. Given tourism demand data’s intrinsic complexity, it is critical to theoretically understand how different decomposition methods provide solutions. However, a comprehensive comparison of decomposition methods in tourism demand forecasting is still lacking. Hence, this study systematically investigates the forecasting performance of decomposition methods in tourism demand. Nine popular decomposition methods and six forecasting methods are employed, and their forecasting performance is compared. With Hong Kong visitor arrivals from eight major sources as a sample, three main conclusions are obtained from empirical results. First, all the decomposition methods generally outperform benchmark at all horizons, in both the level and directional forecasting. Second, decomposition methods can be divided into four categories based on forecasting accuracy. Finally, variational mode decomposition method is consistently superior to other eight decomposition methods and can provide the best forecasts in all cases.
KW - decomposition and ensemble
KW - decomposition methods
KW - machine learning
KW - tourism demand forecasting
KW - variational mode decomposition
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85117463638
U2 - 10.1177/00472875211036194
DO - 10.1177/00472875211036194
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85117463638
SN - 0047-2875
VL - 61
SP - 1682
EP - 1699
JO - Journal of Travel Research
JF - Journal of Travel Research
IS - 7
ER -