TY - GEN
T1 - Cyber-physical assessment and comparison between centralized and distributed control mode in coordinated substation voltage control
AU - Xin, Shujun
AU - Guo, Qinglai
AU - Sun, Hongbin
AU - Wang, Jianghui
AU - Chen, Chen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
PY - 2016/11/10
Y1 - 2016/11/10
N2 - The smart grid is a typical cyber-physical system (CPS) utilizing more advanced information and communication technologies (ICTs), in which hierarchical control system (HCS) plays an essential role. However, it should be noted that for the same control function, HCSs could have multiple modes for making control decisions. They may have different cyber structures and information flows, which could lead to different levels of system reliability under cyber contingency conditions. In this paper, we describe and compare two control modes of coordinated substation voltage control (CSVC), the centralized-control and distributed-execute (CCDE) mode and the distributed mode of centralized-coordinate and distributed-control (CCDC). We first introduce CSVC's control theory, as well as its two application modes. After generating quantitative node-branch cyber-physical models for each, we perform a cyber contingency assessment and compare the results. The computation result shows that distributed mode CCDC is more reliable against cyber contingencies. By comparing their cyber networks, we identify three possible reasons for their differences and propose a simple improvement plan for CCDC, which has proved to be helpful by cyber contingency assessment results.
AB - The smart grid is a typical cyber-physical system (CPS) utilizing more advanced information and communication technologies (ICTs), in which hierarchical control system (HCS) plays an essential role. However, it should be noted that for the same control function, HCSs could have multiple modes for making control decisions. They may have different cyber structures and information flows, which could lead to different levels of system reliability under cyber contingency conditions. In this paper, we describe and compare two control modes of coordinated substation voltage control (CSVC), the centralized-control and distributed-execute (CCDE) mode and the distributed mode of centralized-coordinate and distributed-control (CCDC). We first introduce CSVC's control theory, as well as its two application modes. After generating quantitative node-branch cyber-physical models for each, we perform a cyber contingency assessment and compare the results. The computation result shows that distributed mode CCDC is more reliable against cyber contingencies. By comparing their cyber networks, we identify three possible reasons for their differences and propose a simple improvement plan for CCDC, which has proved to be helpful by cyber contingency assessment results.
KW - Cyber Reliability
KW - Cyber-Physical System
KW - Hierarchical Control
KW - Power System
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85001959403
U2 - 10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741854
DO - 10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741854
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:85001959403
T3 - IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting
BT - 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, PESGM 2016
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, PESGM 2016
Y2 - 17 July 2016 through 21 July 2016
ER -