Corrigendum to “Oxygen-dislocation interaction-mediated nanotwinned nanomartensites in ultra-strong and ductile titanium alloys” [Mater. Today 75 (2024) 85–96, (S1369702124000609), (10.1016/j.mattod.2024.04.003)]

The authors regret that the lack of some important references in the above-mentioned article. We now add a few important related works as references and update the uniform elongation data in Figure 4c. In Figure 4c, we summarized the YS vs UE of the present α′-NTNMs Ti alloys and reported martensite α′ Ti alloys [1–7], α+β Ti alloys [8–19] and (α+β) + O Ti alloys [20–28] (Figure 4d behaves the same way.). All the references and the correct figure are shown here. Please note the corrections do not affect the experimental results and the major conclusions.[Formula presented] Figure 4. Mechanical properties of the base and O-doped Ti alloys. (a) Engineering stress-strain curves for the base alloy, two α′-NTNMs Ti alloys (i.e., 0.5O-1000ST and 0.5O-1020ST alloys), the commercial Ti-6Al-4V alloy [29] and as-prepared Ti-6Al-4V alloy via the HR&SS processing. Compare with the commercial duplex (α+β) Ti-6A1-4V (often with the elastic modulus E of 110 ∼120 GPa), the present α′ martensite Ti alloys have lower E∼87 GPa, which is close to that (∼88 GPa) of the reported Ti-4.5A1-2.5Fe-0.25Si martensite Ti alloy [30], and fall in the range of 78 ∼100 GPa [31–33]. (b) True stress and strain-hardening rate versus strain curves. (c, d) Maps of YS vs UE and SYS vs UE(SUTS- SYS) of the present α′-NTNMs Ti alloys compared with those of previously reported martensite α′ Ti alloys [1–7], α+β Ti alloys [8–19] and (α+β) + O Ti alloys [20–28].