Corrigendum to “Huge wave and drop entrainment mechanism in gas–liquid churn flow” (Chemical Engineering Science (2013) 104 (638–646) (S0009250913006350) (10.1016/j.ces.2013.09.022))

The authors regret that the experimental condition in Figs. 3–6 and Figs. 13–15 were missing. The complete information about the experimental results appears below: 1. In Fig. 3, the flow condition should be: d_T=19 mm, u_sg=6.17 m/s, u_sl=7.49×10⁻³ m/s, [formula presented]2. In Fig. 4, the flow condition should be: d_T=19 mm, M_l=16.25×10⁻² kg/s3. In Fig. 5, the flow condition should be: d_T=19 mm, M_l=16.25×10⁻² kg/s4. In Fig. 6, the flow condition should be: d_T=19 mm, u_sg=6.05 m/s, [formula presented]5. In Fig. 13, the flow condition should be: (a) d_T=19 mm, u_sg=7.95 m s⁻¹, u_sl=2.60×10⁻¹ m·s⁻¹, [formula presented](b) d_T=19 mm, u_sg=9.01 m s⁻¹, u_sl=6.52×10⁻² m·s⁻¹, [formula presented]6. In Fig. 14, the flow condition should be: d_T=19 mm, u_sg=12.73 m s⁻¹, [formula presented]7. In Fig. 15, the flow condition should be:d_T=19 mm, M_l=2.42×10⁻² kg·s⁻¹. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.