Abstract
The authors regret to inform that (i)the micropore shown in Fig. 14 (a)was obtained from a conventional coating. Based on the initial objective of this paper, this micropore would be more suitable to be obtained from a hybrid-layered coating. Although there is no intrinsic difference regarding the morphology of a micropore, the authors still like to give a new figure obtained from a hybrid-layered coating to make up for it, as shown below; (ii)according to the corresponding description in main body of paper (page 107647–9), a reference label is missing in Fig. 12 caption, and it should be: Fig. 12. Grain boundary grooving and surface faceting caused by thermal exposure [65]. (iii)a note should be added to the caption of Fig. 4: (b)was referenced from J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. (DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.11), (d)and (f)was referenced from Scripta Mater. (10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.01.010). [Figure presented]Revised Fig. 14 Morphologies and aspect ratios of the 2D micropores and the 2D mesopores: (a)morphology of an individual 2D micropore, (b)morphology of an individual 2D mesopore, (c)aspect ratios of the 2D micropores and the 2D mesopores.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 107818 |
| Journal | Materials and Design |
| Volume | 175 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 5 Aug 2019 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Achieving self-enhanced thermal barrier performance through a novel hybrid-layered coating design” [Mater. Des. 167 (2019)107647](S026412751930084X)(10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107647)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver