Comparative Performance Evaluation of Absorbents for the Electrowinning-Coupled Competitive Separation CO₂ Capture Process

Electrowinning-coupled competitive separation (ECCS) CO₂ capture technology, utilizing renewable electricity as the energy input, is regarded as a promising electrochemically mediated CO₂ capture approach to substitute for the traditional solvent-based CO₂ scrubbing method. However, this technology is still distant from practical application due to its energy-intensive property, sensitivity to oxygen, amine degradation, and system complexity. The selection of a suitable solvent plays a crucial role in enhancing the overall performance and scalability of the ECCS system. To address an efficient solvent screening method, this paper proposed a systematic comparison of solvents in terms of thermodynamics, electrochemistry, absorption, and desorption performance. The proposed solvent screening method undergoes a critical evaluation through the development of a thermodynamic model and experimentation. Using MEA, EDA, and NH₃ as examples (solvents extensively discussed in the ECCS system), the paper provides a comprehensive discussion of the solvent screening method. Results indicate that EDA exhibits superior CO₂ absorption and thermodynamic performance. NH₃ solvent demonstrates better CO₂ desorption and electrochemical performance. However, there is an antithetical relationship between the thermodynamic and electrochemical performance. This phenomenon arises because the Cu²⁺-solvent complex, characterized by a stronger coupling performance, is more stable, necessitating a higher potential to reduce the Cu²⁺-solvent complex. This leads to increased energy consumption during the solvent regeneration process. Therefore, when solvent screening is conducted, it is essential to categorize and thoroughly consider thermodynamics, electrochemistry, and absorption and desorption performance.