TY - JOUR
T1 - Classification of image matching point clouds over an urban area
AU - Tran, Thi Huong Giang
AU - Otepka, Johannes
AU - Wang, Di
AU - Pfeifer, Norbert
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2018/6/18
Y1 - 2018/6/18
N2 - Airborne laser scanning (ALS) and image matching are the two main techniques for generating point clouds for large areas. While the classification of ALS point clouds has been well investigated, there are few studies that are related to image matching point clouds. In this study, point clouds of multiple resolutions from high-resolution aerial images (ground sampling distance, GSD, of 6 cm) over the city of Vienna were generated and investigated with respect to point density and processing time. Three different study sites with various urban structures are selected from a bigger dataset and classified based on two different approaches: machine learning and a traditional operator-based decision tree. Classification accuracy was evaluated and compared with confusion matrices. In general, the machine learning method results in a higher overall accuracy compared to the simple decision tree method, with accuracies of 87% and 84%, respectively, at the highest resolution. At lower-resolution levels (GSDs of 12 cm and 24 cm), the overall accuracy of machine learning drops by 4% and that of the simple decision tree by 7% for each level. Classifying rasterized data instead of the original point cloud resulted in an accuracy drop of 5%. Thus, using machine learning on point clouds at the highest available resolution is suggested for classification of urban areas.
AB - Airborne laser scanning (ALS) and image matching are the two main techniques for generating point clouds for large areas. While the classification of ALS point clouds has been well investigated, there are few studies that are related to image matching point clouds. In this study, point clouds of multiple resolutions from high-resolution aerial images (ground sampling distance, GSD, of 6 cm) over the city of Vienna were generated and investigated with respect to point density and processing time. Three different study sites with various urban structures are selected from a bigger dataset and classified based on two different approaches: machine learning and a traditional operator-based decision tree. Classification accuracy was evaluated and compared with confusion matrices. In general, the machine learning method results in a higher overall accuracy compared to the simple decision tree method, with accuracies of 87% and 84%, respectively, at the highest resolution. At lower-resolution levels (GSDs of 12 cm and 24 cm), the overall accuracy of machine learning drops by 4% and that of the simple decision tree by 7% for each level. Classifying rasterized data instead of the original point cloud resulted in an accuracy drop of 5%. Thus, using machine learning on point clouds at the highest available resolution is suggested for classification of urban areas.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85054810160
U2 - 10.1080/01431161.2018.1452069
DO - 10.1080/01431161.2018.1452069
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85054810160
SN - 0143-1161
VL - 39
SP - 4145
EP - 4169
JO - International Journal of Remote Sensing
JF - International Journal of Remote Sensing
IS - 12
ER -