Abstract
The catalytic performance of Ni-based supercritical water gasification (SCWG) catalysts may be influenced strongly by the nature of support. In this paper, Ni catalysts with the different supports (CeO2/Al2O3, La2O3/Al2O3, MgO/Al2O3, ZrO2/Al2O3) were prepared by two-step impregnation method. The fresh and used catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD), scanning electron microscopy with an Energy Dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface area measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Thermo-gravimetric analyses (TGA). The catalyst performance testing was conducted by SCWG of glucose at 673K and 23.5MPa with an autoclave reactor, to evaluate the influence of support on the hydrogen production. The results showed that H2 yield for different supports decreased in order: CeO2/Al2O3>La2O3/Al2O3>MgO/Al2O3>Al2O3>ZrO2/Al2O3, and H2 selectivity decreased in order: CeO2/Al2O3>La2O3/Al2O3>ZrO2/Al2O3>Al2O3>MgO/Al2O3. Ni catalysts were deactivated in SCWG reaction because of sintering and coke deposition. Compared with other supports, CeO2 can be used as the promoter of carbon removal from catalyst surfaces.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 125-136 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Biomass and Bioenergy |
| Volume | 67 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Keywords
- Coke deposition
- Hydrogen production
- Ni catalysts
- Supercritical water gasification
- Support
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Behavior of nickel catalysts in supercritical water gasification of glucose: Influence of support'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver