TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of resonance compaction effects on site liquefaction probability by considering spatial variability
AU - Zhai, Shijie
AU - Du, Guangyin
AU - Zhao, Tengyuan
AU - Zhuang, Zhongxun
AU - Liu, Songyu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Traditional methods for simplified soil liquefaction estimation, such as the cone penetration test, often rely on single-point data, failing to account for spatial variability, limiting their accuracy and comprehensiveness. In this study, we aimed to examine the effectiveness of the resonance compaction method for treating liquefiable soils by considering spatial variability. We used Bayesian compression sampling to generate 2D random field profile samples of the soil liquefaction safety coefficient to visualise the effects of resonance compaction. Based on the generated random field samples, the probability of liquefaction at each location on the 2D profile was calculated using Monte Carlo simulations. We observed that the resonance method was effective in reducing or eliminating liquefaction. However, owing to the spatial variability of the geotechnical body, the treatment effects varied at different locations. Thus, this approach provides a robust understanding of the effectiveness of the resonance compaction method for liquefiable foundations and highlights the significance of considering spatial variability through 2D liquefaction probability profiles. The results underscore the need for targeted additional treatments in areas with suboptimal outcomes to ensure comprehensive ground improvement.
AB - Traditional methods for simplified soil liquefaction estimation, such as the cone penetration test, often rely on single-point data, failing to account for spatial variability, limiting their accuracy and comprehensiveness. In this study, we aimed to examine the effectiveness of the resonance compaction method for treating liquefiable soils by considering spatial variability. We used Bayesian compression sampling to generate 2D random field profile samples of the soil liquefaction safety coefficient to visualise the effects of resonance compaction. Based on the generated random field samples, the probability of liquefaction at each location on the 2D profile was calculated using Monte Carlo simulations. We observed that the resonance method was effective in reducing or eliminating liquefaction. However, owing to the spatial variability of the geotechnical body, the treatment effects varied at different locations. Thus, this approach provides a robust understanding of the effectiveness of the resonance compaction method for liquefiable foundations and highlights the significance of considering spatial variability through 2D liquefaction probability profiles. The results underscore the need for targeted additional treatments in areas with suboptimal outcomes to ensure comprehensive ground improvement.
KW - Bayesian compression sampling
KW - Spatial variability
KW - resonance compaction method
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105000432327
U2 - 10.1080/17499518.2025.2478625
DO - 10.1080/17499518.2025.2478625
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:105000432327
SN - 1749-9518
VL - 19
SP - 593
EP - 612
JO - Georisk
JF - Georisk
IS - 3
ER -