TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of a semi-active robotic system for implant placement in atrophic posterior maxilla
T2 - A retrospective case series
AU - Zhao, Ningbo
AU - Zhu, Rongrong
AU - Liao, Lifan
AU - Zhang, Meng
AU - He, Longlong
AU - Zhou, Qin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and safety of a semi-active robotic system for implant placement in atrophic posterior maxilla. Methods: Patients underwent robot-assisted implant placement in atrophic posterior maxilla were identified and included. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed before surgery. The virtual implant position and drilling sequences were planned in the robotic planning system. Patients with positioning marker took an intraoral scan. The preoperative CBCT and the intraoral scan were superimposed in the robotic software. After registration, the implant bed was prepared utilizing the robotic arm with 1 mm safety margin below the maxillary sinus floor. The transcrestal sinus floor elevation (TSFE) was performed by the dentist, followed by the implant placement with the robotic arm. A postoperative CBCT was taken and superimposed with the preoperative one to calculate the accuracy of implant placement. Complications and adverse events were recorded. Deviations between the implant platform and apex levels were analyzed using the paired t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Twenty-seven implants of 20 patients were included. No intraoperative and postoperative complications were reported. The global, lateral and vertical platform deviations were 0.73 ± 0.27 mm, 0.35 ± 0.23 mm and 0.35 ± 0.57 mm, respectively. The global, lateral and vertical apex deviations were 0.77 ± 0.23 mm, 0.41 ± 0.20 mm and 0.34 ± 0.57 mm, respectively. There were significant differences between the global, lateral and vertical deviations between the implant platform and apex levels (P < 0.05, respectively). The angular deviation was 1.58 ± 0.76°. Conclusions: High accuracy and safety for implant placement in atrophic posterior maxilla could be achieved using a semi-active robotic system, with the TSFE procedure performed by the dentist. Clinical significance: This study provides significant evidence to support the application of semi-active robotic systems for implant placement in atrophic posterior maxilla.
AB - Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and safety of a semi-active robotic system for implant placement in atrophic posterior maxilla. Methods: Patients underwent robot-assisted implant placement in atrophic posterior maxilla were identified and included. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed before surgery. The virtual implant position and drilling sequences were planned in the robotic planning system. Patients with positioning marker took an intraoral scan. The preoperative CBCT and the intraoral scan were superimposed in the robotic software. After registration, the implant bed was prepared utilizing the robotic arm with 1 mm safety margin below the maxillary sinus floor. The transcrestal sinus floor elevation (TSFE) was performed by the dentist, followed by the implant placement with the robotic arm. A postoperative CBCT was taken and superimposed with the preoperative one to calculate the accuracy of implant placement. Complications and adverse events were recorded. Deviations between the implant platform and apex levels were analyzed using the paired t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Twenty-seven implants of 20 patients were included. No intraoperative and postoperative complications were reported. The global, lateral and vertical platform deviations were 0.73 ± 0.27 mm, 0.35 ± 0.23 mm and 0.35 ± 0.57 mm, respectively. The global, lateral and vertical apex deviations were 0.77 ± 0.23 mm, 0.41 ± 0.20 mm and 0.34 ± 0.57 mm, respectively. There were significant differences between the global, lateral and vertical deviations between the implant platform and apex levels (P < 0.05, respectively). The angular deviation was 1.58 ± 0.76°. Conclusions: High accuracy and safety for implant placement in atrophic posterior maxilla could be achieved using a semi-active robotic system, with the TSFE procedure performed by the dentist. Clinical significance: This study provides significant evidence to support the application of semi-active robotic systems for implant placement in atrophic posterior maxilla.
KW - Dental
KW - Digital
KW - Implant
KW - Robot-assisted surgery
KW - Sinus floor augmentation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85216563822
U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105593
DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105593
M3 - 文章
C2 - 39875023
AN - SCOPUS:85216563822
SN - 0300-5712
VL - 154
JO - Journal of Dentistry
JF - Journal of Dentistry
M1 - 105593
ER -