TY - GEN
T1 - Angle-based constrained dominance principle in MOEA/D for constrained multi-objective optimization problems
AU - Fan, Zhun
AU - Li, Wenji
AU - Cai, Xinye
AU - Hu, Kaiwen
AU - Lin, Huibiao
AU - Li, Hui
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
PY - 2016/11/14
Y1 - 2016/11/14
N2 - This paper proposes a new constraint handling method named Angle-based Constrained Dominance Principle (ACDP). Unlike the original Constrained Dominance Principle (CDP), this approach adopts the angle information of the objective functions to enhance the population's diversity in the infeasible region. To be more specific, given two infeasible solutions, if the angle of the solutions is greater than a given threshold, they are considered to be non-dominated by each other. For a feasible solution and an infeasible solution, if the angle of the solutions is less than a given threshold, the feasible solution is better, otherwise they are non-dominated. To verify the proposed constraint handling approach ACDP, eight test problems CMOP1 to CMOP8 are introduced. The suggested algorithm MOEA/D-ACDP is compared with MOEA/D-CDP and NSGA-II-CDP on CMOP1 to CMOP8. The experimental results demonstrate that ACDP performs better than CDP in the framework of MOEA/D, and MOEA/D-ACDP is significantly better than NSGA-II-CDP, especially on the test instances with the very low ratio of feasible region against the whole objective space.
AB - This paper proposes a new constraint handling method named Angle-based Constrained Dominance Principle (ACDP). Unlike the original Constrained Dominance Principle (CDP), this approach adopts the angle information of the objective functions to enhance the population's diversity in the infeasible region. To be more specific, given two infeasible solutions, if the angle of the solutions is greater than a given threshold, they are considered to be non-dominated by each other. For a feasible solution and an infeasible solution, if the angle of the solutions is less than a given threshold, the feasible solution is better, otherwise they are non-dominated. To verify the proposed constraint handling approach ACDP, eight test problems CMOP1 to CMOP8 are introduced. The suggested algorithm MOEA/D-ACDP is compared with MOEA/D-CDP and NSGA-II-CDP on CMOP1 to CMOP8. The experimental results demonstrate that ACDP performs better than CDP in the framework of MOEA/D, and MOEA/D-ACDP is significantly better than NSGA-II-CDP, especially on the test instances with the very low ratio of feasible region against the whole objective space.
KW - Constrained Multi-objective Optimization
KW - Constraint-handling Techniques
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85008252606
U2 - 10.1109/CEC.2016.7743830
DO - 10.1109/CEC.2016.7743830
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:85008252606
T3 - 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2016
SP - 460
EP - 467
BT - 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2016
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2016
Y2 - 24 July 2016 through 29 July 2016
ER -