Analysis of inconsistency of SIMPLE-like algorithms and an entirely consistent update technique - The CUT algorithm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

The inconsistency of the second hypothesis of the SIMPLE-like algorithms is analyzed and a remedy - the Consistent Update Technique (CUT algorithm) - for velocity and pressure is proposed. In the CUT algorithm, at each iterative level the mass conservation condition is satisfied implicitly while the momentum equation is satisfied explicitly. In CUT algorithm, a modified equation for the explicit-velocity is suggested, and an adjustable coefficient is introduced. Four 2-D fluid flow and heat transfer problems are solved numerically by both the CUT and SIMPLER algorithms under the same other conditions. Comparisons of CPU time are made and it is found that for the four examples studied, the CUT can at least reduce CPU time by 15-63% with much better robustness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-312
Number of pages24
JournalNumerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of inconsistency of SIMPLE-like algorithms and an entirely consistent update technique - The CUT algorithm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this