Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Agricultural Innovation: A comparative analysis of economic benefits gained by farmers under climate resilient and conventional agricultural practices

  • Ihsan Jamil
  • , Wen Jun
  • , Bushra Mughal
  • , Junaid Wheed
  • , Hadi Hussain
  • , Muhammad Waseem
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University
  • Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering & Information Technology
  • Huazhong Agricultural University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cotton producers in Pakistan must manage many concerns, for example, climate change, traditional agricultural management practices and depletion of land resources i.e. land, and water have resulted in low productivity and pose the largest challenge ever to the sustainability of cotton production in Pakistan. Sustainable land and water (SL&W) management practices of climate resilient agriculture (CRA) such as irrigation (laser land levelling, bed sowing, and drainage management), soil (minimum tillage), and crop (flood and drought tolerant varieties) management practices are recognized as the most efficient and sustainable, particularly for growing cotton. Using cross-sectional data from cotton-growing districts of Punjab, this study attempted to estimate and compare the economic benefits of SL&W management practices of CRA and conventional agricultural practices. The study also estimated the impact of technical training, SL&W management practices of CRA and changing soil quality to improve cotton productivity and sustainability in Punjab, Pakistan. The economic analysis showed that the adopters of CRA have significantly higher economic benefits from one hectare of cotton compared with non-adopters. The economic benefits of adopters significantly increased after implementing SL&W management practices of CRA. Additionally, this study also explores the SL&W management practices; technical training regarding SL&W management practices of CRA; access to credit; varying soil quality; and other inputs lead to significant variation in cotton productivity. The most important implications are that cotton farmers improved productivity through the SL&W management practices of CRA. Hence, proved that CRA are economically, financially, and environmentally, desirable. The findings of the study in a nutshell also reveal that CRA have an absolute advantage over traditional cotton farming.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105581
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume108
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
  3. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  4. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • Agricultural innovation
  • Climate resilient agriculture (CRA)
  • Conventional agriculture
  • Cotton
  • Crop management
  • Soil and water management
  • Soil quality
  • Sustainable land and water management practices (SL&W)
  • Technical training

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Agricultural Innovation: A comparative analysis of economic benefits gained by farmers under climate resilient and conventional agricultural practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this