TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomized competitive group testing procedure
AU - Zhang, Guiqing
AU - Cheng, Yongxi
AU - Xu, Yinfeng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - In many fault detection problems, we want to identify all defective items from a set of n items using the minimum number of tests. Group testing is for the scenario where each test is on a subset of items, and tells whether the subset contains at least one defective item or not. In practice, the number d of defective items is often unknown in advance. In this paper, we propose a randomized group testing procedure RGT for the scenario where the number d of defectives is unknown in advance, and prove that RGT is competitive. By incorporating numerical results, we obtain improved upper bounds on the expected number of tests performed by RGT, for 1 ≤ d≤ 10 6. In particular, for 1 ≤ d≤ 10 6 and the special case where n is a power of 2, we obtain an upper bound of dlognd+Cd+O(logd) with C≈ 2.67 on the expected number of tests performed by RGT, which is better than the currently best upper bound in Cheng et al. (INFORMS J Comput 26(4):677–689, 2014). We conjecture that the above improved upper bounds based on numerical results from 1 ≤ d≤ 10 6 actually hold for all d≥ 1.
AB - In many fault detection problems, we want to identify all defective items from a set of n items using the minimum number of tests. Group testing is for the scenario where each test is on a subset of items, and tells whether the subset contains at least one defective item or not. In practice, the number d of defective items is often unknown in advance. In this paper, we propose a randomized group testing procedure RGT for the scenario where the number d of defectives is unknown in advance, and prove that RGT is competitive. By incorporating numerical results, we obtain improved upper bounds on the expected number of tests performed by RGT, for 1 ≤ d≤ 10 6. In particular, for 1 ≤ d≤ 10 6 and the special case where n is a power of 2, we obtain an upper bound of dlognd+Cd+O(logd) with C≈ 2.67 on the expected number of tests performed by RGT, which is better than the currently best upper bound in Cheng et al. (INFORMS J Comput 26(4):677–689, 2014). We conjecture that the above improved upper bounds based on numerical results from 1 ≤ d≤ 10 6 actually hold for all d≥ 1.
KW - Expectation
KW - Fault detection
KW - Group testing
KW - Randomized algorithms
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85033588909
U2 - 10.1007/s10878-017-0190-5
DO - 10.1007/s10878-017-0190-5
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85033588909
SN - 1382-6905
VL - 35
SP - 667
EP - 683
JO - Journal of Combinatorial Optimization
JF - Journal of Combinatorial Optimization
IS - 3
ER -