Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A randomised comparison of biodegradable polymer-and permanent polymer-coated platinum-chromium everolimuseluting coronary stents in China: The EVOLVE China study

  • Yaling Han
  • , Haiwei Liu
  • , Yuejin Yang
  • , Jian Zhang
  • , Kai Xu
  • , Guosheng Fu
  • , Xi Su
  • , Tiemin Jiang
  • , Wenyue Pang
  • , Jiyan Chen
  • , Zuyi Yuan
  • , Hui Li
  • , Haichang Wang
  • , Tao Hong
  • , Huiliang Liu
  • , Fucheng Sun
  • , Dominic J. Allocco
  • , Mingdong Zhang
  • , Keith D. Dawkins
  • Shenyang General Hospital of PLA
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
  • TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital
  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
  • Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital
  • Medical College of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces
  • China Medical University
  • Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University
  • Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd.
  • Air Force Medical University
  • Peking University
  • Beijing Affiliated Hospital of Armed Police Medical College
  • Ministry of Health of People's Republic of China
  • Boston Scientific Corporation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aims: The EVOLVE China randomised study sought to evaluate the clinical safety and effectiveness of the SYNERGY bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent (EES) for the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease in China. Methods and results: Eligible patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions were randomised (1:1) to receive the SYNERGY or PROMUS Element Plus stent. The primary endpoint was in-stent late loss at nine months. Secondary endpoints included death, MI, revascularisation, and stent thrombosis up to 12 months. A total of 412 subjects were randomised (205 SYNERGY; 207 PROMUS Element Plus) at 14 sites in China from October 2013 to July 2014. SYNERGY was non-inferior to PROMUS Element Plus for the primary endpoint of nine-month in-stent late loss: SYNERGY 0.20±0.33 mm vs. PROMUS Element Plus 0.17±0.38 mm with an upper one-sided 97.5% confidence interval of the difference (0.10 mm), significantly less than the non-inferiority margin (0.15 mm; p<0.0008). Clinical adverse event rates were low and not significantly different between groups at nine and 12 months (all p>0.05). Conclusions: In the EVOLVE China trial, the SYNERGY bioabsorbable polymer-coated EES was noninferior to the PROMUS Element Plus permanent polymer-coated EES for the primary endpoint of late loss at nine months.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1210-1217
Number of pages8
JournalEuroIntervention
Volume13
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Clinical trials
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Drug-eluting stent

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A randomised comparison of biodegradable polymer-and permanent polymer-coated platinum-chromium everolimuseluting coronary stents in China: The EVOLVE China study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this