Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of MDM4 genetic variants and cancer susceptibility

  • Yajing Zhai
  • , Zhijun Dai
  • , Hairong He
  • , Fan Gao
  • , Lihong Yang
  • , Yalin Dong
  • , Jun Lu
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Molecular epidemiological research suggests that mouse double minute 4 (MDM4) polymorphisms may be associated with cancer susceptibility, but results remain controversial. To derive a more precise evaluation, we performed a PRISMA compliant meta-analysis focused on five single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs11801299, rs1380576, rs10900598, rs1563828, and rs4245739) of MDM4. Overall, 23 studies involving 22,218 cases and 55,033 controls were analyzed. The results showed that rs4245739 was significantly associated with a decreased cancer risk in the allelic (C vs. A: odds ratio [OR] = 0.848, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.765-0.941, P = 0.002), heterozygous (AC vs. AA: OR = 0.831, 95% CI = 0.735-0.939, P = 0.003), and dominant (AC+CC vs. A: OR = 0.823, 95% CI = 0.727-0.932, P = 0.002) models. The association was more prominent in Asians. No significant association was found using any genetic model for the rs11801299, rs1380576, rs10900598, and rs1563828 SNPs. These results indicate that the rs4245739 polymorphism may contribute to a decreased cancer susceptibility and support the hypothesis that genetic variants in the MDM4 genes act as important modifiers of cancer risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73935-73944
Number of pages10
JournalOncotarget
Volume7
Issue number45
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Cancer susceptibility
  • MDM4
  • Meta-analysis
  • Polymorphism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of MDM4 genetic variants and cancer susceptibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this