Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Comparison of Different Types of Resonant Tanks for OBC Applications by Using a Universal and Automatic Design Methodology

  • Ziang Li
  • , Shuo Zhang
  • , Sheng Qu
  • , Mochen Xu
  • , Jinjun Liu
  • , Yuqi Wei
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University
  • State Key Laboratory of Space-Power Sources

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

CLLLC class resonant converters are widely applied in bidirectional isolated DC-DC power conversion for the advantages of high efficiency and high power density. With the increasing scenarios of wide voltage gain range, the time domain model is widely used in the design process of resonant converters since it has much higher accuracy. Additionally, the asymmetrical resonant tank parameter design can further utilize the design freedom and reach a better performance. However, the design process of the asymmetrical CLLLC (ACLLLC) resonant tanks has excessive computational burden and complicated steps, especially when the optimal design of the power devices and magnetic core are included, which introduces many engineering restrictions such as the magnetic core saturation, current density, window coefficient, etc. Furthermore, by removing one resonant inductor, CLLC resonant converter is also widely used resonant tanks for bidirectional power conversion. The comparison of these two types of resonant tanks is lacking, which increases the burden of topology selection. This paper proposes a universal and automatic design methodology for CLLLC class resonant converter, which includes the parameter design and magnetic core design. The engineering restrictions are also included, which ensures that the design results can be applied directly. By using the parameter equivalence principle and the proposed design procedure, the comparison of CLLC and ACLLLC can be conducted for all common applications, which shows that CLLC and ACLLLC have identical electrical characteristics, but CLLC has smaller magnetic related loss and better power density characteristics. The design process and comparison results are verified by a 1 kW prototype with peak efficiency of 98.44%, which shows that the CLLC resonant tank has better power density and efficiency performance.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2025 IEEE 8th International Electrical and Energy Conference, CIEEC 2025
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages3040-3045
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)9798331542979
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025
Event8th IEEE International Electrical and Energy Conference, CIEEC 2025 - Changsha, China
Duration: 16 May 202518 May 2025

Publication series

Name2025 IEEE 8th International Electrical and Energy Conference, CIEEC 2025

Conference

Conference8th IEEE International Electrical and Energy Conference, CIEEC 2025
Country/TerritoryChina
CityChangsha
Period16/05/2518/05/25

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

Keywords

  • automatic design
  • bidirectional power conversion
  • resonant converters
  • topology comparison

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison of Different Types of Resonant Tanks for OBC Applications by Using a Universal and Automatic Design Methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this